Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Cycle 2/Wikimedia Chile - Interviews with members
Information
[edit]
What group or community is this source coming from?
| name of group | Wikimedia Chile |
| virtual location (page-link) or physical location (city/state/country) | offwiki |
| Location type (e.g. local wiki, Facebook, in-person discussion, telephone conference) | in-person/chat/telephone interviews |
| # of participants in this discussion (a rough count) | 5 |
Summary
[edit]- Theme key
- Healthy, inclusive communities
- The augmented age
- A truly global movement
- The most trusted source of knowledge
- Engaging in the knowledge ecosystem
- Questions key
- What impact would we have on the world if we follow this theme?
- How important is this theme relative to the other 4 themes? Why?
- Focus requires tradeoffs. If we increase our effort in this area in the next 15 years, is there anything we’re doing today that we would need to stop doing?
- What else is important to add to this theme to make it stronger?
- Who else will be working in this area and how might we partner with them?
| Line | Theme | Question | Summary Statement | Keywords |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A | 1 | We will have a more welcoming and safe environment for new collaborators, so we can foster a stable growth in the community. | new users, environment |
| 2 | A | 2 | It is the most important theme, since these are the future bases for the construction of all this collective effort. | relevance |
| 3 | A | 5 | We believe that we are (as a movement) the agents of change, so we don't identify a key actor/institution in the process. | movement |
| 4 | B | 1 | We will allow Wikipedia and other projects to be effectively consumed by new generations. | future |
| 5 | B | 2 | It is important, but we believe that the technology advancement will force us to work for adapting to the future, so it is not worth spending time in this right now. | technology |
| 6 | B | 5 | We believe that the community must be a fundamental part of the change, since the construction of new tools will allow us to improve the way we edit and consume Wikipedia. | community |
| 7 | C | 1 | We will add the voices who still don't have voice or representation in the projects, and this will allow the inclusion on the Internet era of people who are in the gaps which we haven't worked yet. | gap, diversity |
| 8 | C | 2 | It is one of the most important themes since listening to all non-represented voices we can build a better encyclopedia for everyone. | diversity |
| 9 | C | 5 | Working with organizations devoted to inclusion in various fields: indigenous, women, migrants, etc. | partners |
| 10 | D | 1 | We will have an information repository that has a superior quality, neutral and possibly verified by experts in the different areas of human knowledge. | quality, experts |
| 11 | D | 2 | It is very relevant, because if we generate a source of knowledge that has validations in its contents and format, we can be recognized with an additional value by the community and the people who access the projects. | relevance |
| 12 | D | 5 | We should partner with educational institutions that have masters and doctoral programs to carry out a comprehensive validation of content. | education, partnerships |
| 13 | E | 1 | We will engage with new institutions in order to preserve knowledge and improve preservation mechanisms. | partnerships |
| 14 | E | 2 | It is less important, since the work developed so far allows us to keep working on the content itself, instead of forging new alliances. | relevance |
| 15 | E | 5 | Work with institutions that have information of common interest to the humanity. | partnerships |