Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Cycle 2/Bengali Community
Information
[edit]What group or community is this source coming from?
| name of group | Bengali Wikimedians |
| virtual location (page-link) or physical location (city/state/country) | w:bn:উইকিপিডিয়া:উইকিমিডিয়া আন্দোলনের কৌশল নির্ধারণ |
| Location type (e.g. local wiki, Facebook, in-person discussion, telephone conference) | Local wiki, Hangout, in person meeting |
| # of participants in this discussion (a rough count) | 7 |
Summary
[edit]The summary is a group of summary sentences and associated keywords that describe the relevant topic(s). Below is an example.
| Theme (refer to key) | Question (refer to key) | Summary Statement | Keywords | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A | 2 | I think that Healthy, Inclusive Communities is critical because without a welcoming environment for new readers and users, we will not have an impact in any of these other areas. | Community Health, Readers, Users, Impact |
| 2 | B | 1 | The Augmented Age is more important than the other themes because with improved technology and new ways to contribute information, we would be able to quickly produce more quality content in more languages. | Knowledge, Technology |
Taken together, all the summary sentences should provide an accurate summary of what was discussed with the specific community.
Fill in the table, using these 2 keys.
- Theme key
- Healthy, inclusive communities
- The augmented age
- A truly global movement
- The most trusted source of knowledge
- Engaging in the knowledge ecosystem
- Questions key
- What impact would we have on the world if we follow this theme?
- How important is this theme relative to the other 4 themes? Why?
- Focus requires tradeoffs. If we increase our effort in this area in the next 15 years, is there anything we’re doing today that we would need to stop doing?
- What else is important to add to this theme to make it stronger?
- Who else will be working in this area and how might we partner with them?
| Line | Theme (refer to key) | Question (refer to key) | Summary Statement | Keywords |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A | 1 | If we follow this theme Wikimedia movement will spread across the continents such as Africa, Middle East, South Asia and Latin America where Wikimedia movement is less recognized. | Community Health |
| 2 | A | 2 | This theme is the most important one because Healthy, inclusive communities are needed to spread the word of our movement in all languages and cultural communities. | Diversity |
| 3 | A | 3 & 4 | To do that we need more focus on the people who has different opinions and we should welcome them. With active participation from all fronts, we could achieve our goal. | goal, diversity, community |
| 4 | D | 1 | If we follow this theme Wikimedia will be the simplest and the most trusted source of knowledge. | Trustworthiness |
| 5 | D & E | 2 | This theme is also an important one because if we can ensure quality and trustworthiness we could also be able to bring researchers and experts into our readers' ecosystem. That will eventually help us create a better ecosystem of knowledge. | quality and knowledge ecosystem |
| 6 | B & E | 2 | To ensure the quality of our contents technological improvement is unavoidable. If we don't keep up with the world in terms of technology we will be left behind. We should also create awareness among the users to produce quality contents. | technological improvement, quality |
| 7 | C | 4 | Wikipedia has already proved the trustworthiness of it's contents now it's time to make sure that evry human being with necessary device can access our contents. | accesscibility |
| 8 | C | 4 | If we can inform everyone about the importance and usability of Wikimedia projects, then the knowledge discrimination will be greatly reduced. | knowledge discrimination |
| 9 | D | 4 | We could increase wiki contents with technical developments and by automated tools, it should be kept in mind though it does not have any negative impact on the quality. | quality |
| 10 | D | 4 | It is better to take expert's help in special cases. In some practical cases, various projects can be made with the help of experts. | expert |
| 11 | ||||
| 12 | ||||
| 13 | ||||
| 14 | ||||
| 15 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 18 | ||||
| 19 | ||||
| 20 | ||||
| 21 | ||||
| 22 | ||||
| 23 | ||||
| 24 | ||||
| 25 | ||||
| 26 | ||||
| 27 | ||||
| 28 | ||||
| 29 | ||||
| 30 | ||||
| 31 | ||||
| 32 | ||||
| 33 | ||||
| 34 | ||||
| 35 | ||||
| 36 | ||||
| 37 | ||||
| 38 | ||||
| 39 | ||||
| 40 |
If you need more lines, you can copy them from Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Lines.
Detailed notes (Optional)
[edit]If you have detailed notes in addition to the summary, you may add them here. For example, the notes may come from an in-person discussion or workshop. If your discussion happened on a wiki or other online space, you do not need to copy the detailed notes here.