Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2013/Votes/Bletilla

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Bletilla

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral

Bletilla talk • contribs • SULutil (accounts) / stalktoy • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: ja, en-3, ko-1, zh-1
  • Personal info: I have been a registered editor since January, 2006. Whilst most of my edits are in Japanese Wikipedia, I am standing for a candidate because I want to contribute greatly to development of Wikipedias. I am a sysop in Japanese Wikipedia and Strategywiki. I think that Asian stewards are few. Because my job is shift work, it will be easy that I will join at on-line meetings. Because I am good at coordination, I want to be a coordinator mainly. Oh, I forgot. "Bletilla" in ruwiki and enwiki are not me.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: ja, en-3, ko-1, zh-1
  • Informationen zur Person: Seit Januar 2006 bin ich registrierter Autor. Obwohl die meisten meiner Edits in der japanischen Wikipedia getätigt worden sind, möchte ich hier kandidieren, da ich viel zur Entwicklung der Wikipedias beitragen will. Ich bin Administrator in der japanischen Wikipedia und in Strategywiki. Ich denke, es gibt wenige asiatische Stewards. Da ich beruflich Schichtarbeit leiste, wird es für mich leicht sein, an Online-Meetings teilzunehmen. Da ich gut koordinieren kann, möchte ich vorwiegend Koordinator sein. Etwas vergass ich noch: Ich bin nicht der "Bletilla" auf ruwiki und enwiki.
suomi:
  • Kielet: ja, en-3, ko-1, zh-1
  • Henkilökohtaiset tiedot: Rekisteröidyin käyttäjäksi tammikuussa 2006. Vaikka suurin osa muokkauksistani on japaninkieliseen Wikipediaan, asetun ehdolle koska haluan tukea Wikipedioiden kehitystä. Olen ylläpitäjä japaninkielisessä Wikipediassa ja Strategywikissä. Mielestäni aasialaisia ylivalvojia on vähän. Teen vuorotyötä, joten voin helposti osallistua tapaamisiin internetissä. Koska olen hyvä asioiden koordinoimisessa, haluan toimia pääasiassa koordinaattorina. Ai niin, "Bletilla" ruwikissä ja enwikissä en ole minä.
עברית:
  • שפות: ja, en-3, ko-1, zh-1
  • מידע אישי: דיבור כאן
Bahasa Indonesia:
  • Bahasa yang dikuasai: ja, en-3, ko-1, zh-1
  • Informasi pribadi: tuliskan pernyataan Anda di sini
italiano:
  • Lingue: ja, en-3, ko-1, zh-1
  • Informazioni personali: Da gennaio 2006 sono un utente registrato attivo. Nonostante la maggior parte della mia attività sia sulla Wikipedia giapponese, mi sono presentato come candidato steward poichè voglio contribuire di più allo sviluppo delle varie Wikipedie. Sono un amministratore su Wikipedia in lingua giapponese e su Strategywiki. Penso che di steward asiatici ce ne siano pochi. Poichè il mio lavoro prevede dei turni, mi sarà facile partecipare alle riunioni on-line. Poichè sono bravo nel coordinamento e nella gestione, voglio essere principalmente un coordinatore. Ah, dimenticavo, non sono il "Bletilla" di ru.wiki e en.wiki.
日本語:
  • 言語: ja, en-3, ko-1, zh-1
  • 候補者の情報: 2006年1月から登録編集者です。編集の殆どは、日本語版ウィキペディアとはいえ、ウィキペディアの発展に寄与したくて立候補しました。日本語版ウィキペディアとTrategywikiで管理者をしています。アジアのスチュワードは、少ないと思います。仕事はシフト制なので、オンラインの会合には参加しやすいでしょう。調整型なので、主に調整役になりたいです。おっと、忘れていました。ロシア語版ウィキペディアと英語版ウィキペディアの「Bletilla」は、別人です。
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: ja, en-3, ko-1, zh-1
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Ik ben een geregistreerde gebruiker sinds januari 2006. Hoewel mijn meeste bewerkingen op de Japanse Wikipedia zijn, ben ik kandidaat, want ik wil graag een grote bijdrage leveren aan de ontwikkeling van Wikipedia's. Ik ben een moderator op de Japanse Wikipedia en op strategywiki. Ik denk dat er weinig Aziatische stewards zijn. Doordat ik in ploegendienst werk, kan ik gemakkelijk deelnemen aan online bijeenkomsten. Doordat ik goed ben in het coördineren, wil ik vooral een coördinator zijn. Oh, ik vergat het bijna. Ik ben niet de "Bletilla" op ruwiki en enwiki.
norsk:
  • Språk: ja, en-3, ko-1, zh-1
  • Personlig informasjon: Jeg har vært registrert bruker siden januar 2006. Selv om hoveddelen av bidragene mine er på Wikipedia på japansk, stiller jeg som kandidat fordi jeg ønsker å bidra mer til utviklingen av wikipediaer. Jeg er administrator på Wikipedia på japansk og Strategywiki. Jeg syns det er for få asiatiske forvaltere. Siden jeg jobber på skift, er det enkelt for meg å bli med på online-møter. Siden jeg er en god til å koordinere, ønsker jeg å primært være koordinator. (PS! «Bletilla» på ruwiki og enwiki er ikke meg.)
中文（简体）:
  • 可说语言: ja, en-3, ko-1, zh-1
  • 个人资料: 我于2006年1月成为注册用户。然而当我大多数的贡献在日语维基百科时，我成为了一位候选人，因为我想为维基百科的发展做出重大的贡献。我是日语维基百科和StrategyWiki的管理员。我认为亚洲的管理员较少。因为我的工作是轮班制，我将比较容易的参与在线会议。因为我善于协调，我想主要是成为协调员。哦，忘了说了，俄语维基和英语维基的“Bletilla”不是我。

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2013/Questions#Bletilla


Yes

[edit]
  1. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Moral support. ►Safir yüzüklü Ceklimesaj 07:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Bk1 168 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Bk1 168 (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Arius1998 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Arius1998 (talk) 04:08, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Abutorsam007 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •   Abu Torsam  15:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  İncelemeelemani (talk) 03:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Gálaniitoluodda (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Gálaniitoluodda (talk) 14:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Ellery (talk) 14:58, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Wangxuan8331800 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Wangxuan8331800 (talk) 17:42, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9. ArishG (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2013 •  ArishG (talk) 08:08, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Makecat)2013 •  Zeljko (talk) 09:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Orgio89 (Eligible, checked by Makecat)2013 •  Orgio89 (talk) 03:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
       Rmb009 (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Rmb009 (talk) 07:52, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Ermeson15 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  Ermeson15 (talk) 15:24, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Seven twentynine (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  Seven twentynine (talk) 22:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  I can see the candidate as a good catalyst. Cross-wiki experience may be advantageous but I'm pretty confident that he'd get an idea of the policies and settle in. Gryllida 12:31, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Mátyás (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Ganbatte kudasai, Bletilla-san! Mátyás (talk) 13:48, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  B20180 (talk) 04:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Axpde)2013 •  Jusjih (talk) 12:48, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Kurihaya (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  Kurihaya (talk) 02:49, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hibiki-c (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2013 •  Hibiki-c (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Edouard-rainaut (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2013 •  Edouard-rainaut (talk) 19:25, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21. TeleD (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2013 •  TeleD (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 14:35, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2013 •  Wpollard (talk) 15:00, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  Ulflarsen (talk) 17:42, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Ganesh Paudel (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2013 •  Ganesh Paudel (talk) 11:36, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26. MOTOI Kenkichi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  主に記事の拡充をお願いしたい。参考：基本的原則･履歴 MOTOI Kenkichi (talk) 00:30, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27. 御門桜 (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  御門桜 (MIKADO,Sakura) (talk) 12:18, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  A steward has to be active to be useful. We do not need more inactive stewards, and an admin that has done only 127 administrative actions in 5 years and thinks this is not a low activity level should not become a steward. Snowolf How can I help? 00:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Quentinv57 (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  I’m still waiting for your answers on the question page. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  Unsatisfactory answers, sorry. Érico Wouters msg 00:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  Too inactive. Rschen7754 00:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oursana (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  inactive see Snowolf Oursana (talk) 01:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Barely active, even on homewiki, and not much global experience. Ajraddatz (Talk) 01:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Makecat (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Not active even on home wiki ja.wp. Makecat 03:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Trongphu (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  EXTREMELY unactive! Making up lame excuses. Can't be a steward like this! Trongphu (talk) 04:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Morning Sunshine (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:29, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Savh (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Per the lack of answers. 5 blocks and 5 deletions in 5 years as an admin is IMO not enough experience for Stewardship. Savhñ 06:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11. MJ94 (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Inactivity concerns and lack of answers. MJ94 (talk) 06:49, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  inactive Matanya (talk) 07:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Reade (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Reade (talk) 08:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Basically inactive and lack of crosswiki experience. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 09:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Micki (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Per above. Please try next year. micki 09:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  Too inactive Legoktm (talk) 09:55, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Hosiryuhosi (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  per above. Hosiryuhosi (talk) 10:38, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  David1010 (talk) 10:40, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Lukas²³ (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  inactive, see Snowolf. Lukas²³ (talk) 11:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Luckas Blade (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  --Luckas msg 13:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Barras (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Not really active, doesn't look like that will change. Barras talk 14:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Vacation9 (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Don't like answers, and per Snowolf's concerns. Vacation9 (talk) 17:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24. John F. Lewis (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Inactive administrator with a lack (partial) of experience. Translating this to a steward would be a possible detrimental choice.. John F. Lewis (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Jbribeiro1 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  José Luiz talk 21:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Hoo man)2013 •  I do not see enough cross-wiki work here. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 21:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Nickispeaki (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Nickispeaki (talk) 22:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Courcelles 23:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Waka Waka (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Hurricanefan24 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  CW inactivity. Hurricanefan24 (talk) 01:42, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  31. AGK (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  Not active enough. AGK [•] 02:12, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  At least for now. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 02:13, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Article editor (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  Article editor (talk) 04:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Per Snowolf Wiki13 talk 10:05, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Xqt (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2013 •   @xqt 14:38, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Ul1-82-2 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  Ul1-82-2 (talk) 15:15, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  Vogone (talk) 15:27, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Smile4ever (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  Smile4ever (talk) 15:57, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Armbrust (talk) 17:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Aced (Eligible, checked by Legoktm)2013 •  per Snowolf Aced (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Banfield (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Banfield - Reclamos aquí 20:04, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  42. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2013 •  Edit count is not everything, but it is the only indication we have of interaction with other users and as a sustained indication of character and judgement that we have. KTo288 (talk) 21:54, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Heubergen (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  Heubergen (talk) 22:39, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Ralgis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  — mantis [religiosa] — 01:34, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Vyom25 (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Vyom25 (talk) 10:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  –Ejs-80 12:15, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Vale93b (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2013 •  lack of activity Vale93b (talk) 14:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  48. JayJay (Eligible, checked by Mr.Ajedrez)2013 •  Not impressed with answers JayJay (talk) 19:18, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  49. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Mr.Ajedrez)2013 •  CT Cooper · talk 19:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  Shanmugamp7 (talk) 01:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  FASTILY (TALK) 07:40, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  52. EKMK (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  EKMK (talk) 12:07, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Storkk (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  Inactive where he does have tools. Storkk (talk) 16:08, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Mike Peel (Eligible, checked by Alan.lorenzo)2013 •  Mike Peel (talk) 20:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Thogo (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2013 •  per above, plus I'm not impressed by the answers to the questions. თოგო (D) 23:03, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Daniel Mietchen (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Too little activity, both across wikis and as admin. Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 02:11, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Aguzer (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  --This unsigned article written by: User:Aguzer 15:47, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Thompson.matthew (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  per savh Thompson.matthew (talk) 16:17, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Tuvalkin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Inactive, sorry. Tuvalkin (talk) 17:46, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Aplikasi (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  Aplikasi (talk) 18:43, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Avraham (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2013 •  Answers (including those lacking) indicate that the user probably needs more cross-wiki and maintenance experience at this point. Thank you for volunteering. Avi (talk) 01:20, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Gobonobo (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2013 •  Gobōnobō + c 13:23, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  63. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 18:28, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  64. AlexandrDmitri (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  -- Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 19:05, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:34, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  66. billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  Competent, though I wanted to see advanced permissions, or xwiki activity, or something above the ordinary. — billinghurst sDrewth 15:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Baiji (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  Baiji --> (Opinión) 17:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Bencmq (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  inactive, stewards have access to sensitive tools, hence it's not really 'the more the better'. Bencmq (talk) 04:59, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  69. DonRumata (Eligible, checked by Makecat)2013 •  DonRumata (talk) 09:46, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Quintucket (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Low activity, low cross-wikiness, and slow response rate in answering questions. Quintucket (talk) 17:12, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Jusdafax (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  Per Snowolf. Not enough activity. Jusdafax (talk) 06:22, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  You're not enough implicated in the projct, especially in many languages Laurent Jerry (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Doctree (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Answers to questions are a concern. Doctree (talk) 05:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Following all above, I don't think that I would trust you.--Peter2006son (talk) 06:45, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Philosopher (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  Per Snowolf and because of a lack of experience dealing with issues in other languages. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 02:35, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Argos'Dad (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  Argos'Dad (talk) 03:01, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  77. ComQuat (Eligible, checked by Alan.lorenzo)2013 •  hasn't been active enough as sysop ComQuat (talk) 23:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Facial expression (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  I read the answers to questions, but I couldn't see what Bletilla would like to do as a steward. Facial expression (talk) 06:47, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Geraki (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Geraki TL 20:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Reisio (Eligible, checked by White Master King)2013 •  Reisio (talk) 02:31, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Beeblebrox (Eligible, checked by Mr.Ajedrez)2013 •  Stewards need to be active to be useful. Was hoping to be persuaded by their answers to questions, disappointed that they apparently gave up already. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:35, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Avocato (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2013 •  Not active enough. Avocato (talk) 19:21, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Albertus Aditya (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2013 •  Albertus Aditya (talk) 12:44, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  84. FalconL (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2013 •  FalconL ?! 20:56, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Ali1610 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Ali1610 (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Cameta (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2013 •  Cameta (talk) 22:57, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Grondin (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •   Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 17:29, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  88. O. Morand (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  Did not answer all questions and not so active O. Morand (talk) 17:34, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by Alan.lorenzo)2013 •  Insufficient experience cross-wiki, or for that matter on home wiki. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 01:50, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Gonzolito (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2013 •  Not enough experience and activity Gonzolito (talk) 10:39, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Daniel749 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2013 •  Daniel749 talk 14:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Tarheel95 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Tarheel95 (talk) 19:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Shaun9876 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  Per Snowolf §haun 9∞76 ༆ 01:45, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  94. SpartacksCompatriot (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  SpartacksCompatriot (talk) 14:49, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Didieram (Eligible, checked by Mr.Ajedrez)2013 •  Didieram (talk) 18:35, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Mogador (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  Mogador (talk) 03:19, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Jorgecarleitao (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Jorgecarleitao (talk) 10:51, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  98. GenOrl (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  GenOrl (talk) 13:34, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Iste Praetor (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  You seem willing to do a good job, but I don't feel comfortable to support here due to the low level of activity, sorry. Iste (D) 00:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. LlamaAl (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  Not very active. LlamaAl (talk) 00:40, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
       GeoJoe1000 (Not eligible, checked by Bennylin) •  GeoJoe1000 (talk) 03:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Dimi z (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  I would really like to vote positively, but you don't seem active and experienced enough. Work on the projects for a year and then try again! Dimi z (talk) 09:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 10:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
       Dan81 (Not eligible, checked by Odisha1) •  Dan81 (talk) 05:33, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 17:02, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  --cyrfaw (talk) 11:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Himetv (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  Himetv (talk) 12:37, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Helmy oved (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2013 •  Helmy oved 23:38, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Kiltpin (Eligible, checked by Makecat)2013 •  Kiltpin (talk) 12:07, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 18:26, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Derschueler (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2013 •  sorry, but you are inactive Derschueler 16:17, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Sokac121 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Sokac121 (talk) 12:05, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2013/Votes/Bletilla&oldid=24933269"