Stewards/Confirm/2013/Axpde

The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Axpde

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: de, en
Personal info: For health reasons I wasn't able to hold my office. I stayed at hospital for more than half a year and therefore wasn't online most of the time. Last week I started my occupational rehabilitation - and beyond that to care more about wikipedia/wikimedia again. Alone, I'll need my time, to rediscover my old constitution. I understand the displeasure about my absence, but I ask for mercy and some more time to give proof of my usefulness. Greetings

español:

Idiomas: en
Información personal: Por motivos de salud no fui capaz de mantenerme en el cargo. Estuve en el hospital durante más de medio año y por lo tante no estuve conectado la mayoría del tiempo. La semana pasada empecé mi rehabilitación laboral - y además de eso preocuparme más de wikipedia/wikimedia de nuevo. Solo, necesitaré mi tiempo, para recuperar mi forma. Entiendo el desagrado por mi ausencia, pero pido clemencia y algo más de tiempo para dar prueba de mi utilidad. Saludos a×p_de ^Hello! 08:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

русский:

Языки: en
Личная информация: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen: de, en
Informationen zur Person: Aus gesundheitlichen Gründen konnte ich mein Amt nicht wahrnehmen. Ich war mehr als ein halbes Jahr im Krankenhaus und daher die meiste Zeit nicht online. Letzte Woche habe ich meine berufliche Wiedereingliederung gestartet und habe seit dem begonnen, mich auch wieder mehr um wikipedia/wikimedia zu kümmern. Allein, ich werde wohl noch ein bisschen Zeit brauchen, bis ich meine alte Form wiedergefunden habe. Ich kann den Unmut über meine Abwesenheit verstehen, bitte aber um Nachsicht und etwas mehr Zeit, um meine Nützlichkeit unter Beweis zu stellen. Grüße a×p_de ^Hello! 08:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Axpde

Remove --Vogone (talk) 00:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove He became inactive as soon as he got the steward status (see his logged actions on meta). I haven't see him for months, shame that he didn't even said goodbye... -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. While I am aware that Axpde has had a difficult year, and I don't envy him one bit, he is for all intents are purposes inactive, and the whole idea behind reconfirmation is to evaluate year by year whether continued access to the steward toolset makes sense, and I do not believe it does at this time. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:29, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove solely due to inactivity. --Rs chen 7754 00:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive. Thanks for your work. Érico Wouters ^msg 01:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC) Keep Looks you are back now and so changing my comment to "keep". Érico Wouters ^msg 17:49, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove only because of inactivity. --Make cat 03:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove White Master (e s) 06:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This was unimpressive coming from a steward, and would have been an abuse of tools had you acted on it. However, it's been quite a while since that comment and by itself it's nothing to oppose over. In any case I'm going to support removal due to inactivity. Jafeluv (talk) 09:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, due to inactivity and lack of statement (=lost touch with the community?) I am aware, though, that willingness to come back would be most welcome. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - sorry, but no longer really active. -Barras talk 13:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, too inactive. -Mh7kJ (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, never active. Ajraddatz (Talk) 16:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
To expand on my reasoning a bit, Axpde has never been active as a steward, and not really as a global sysop either[1]. Axpde's few actions in the last couple of days are more than (s)he has ever done before. In my mind, applying for stewardship and then only using the rights around the time of a confirmation is an abuse of the trust placed in him by the community. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:18, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, per Jafeluv and Ajraddatz. I am surprised that, even though active on his home-wiki, he is unable (or unwilling) to perform a single log action or give a reason for his absence here on meta. Sa vh ^ñ 17:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, I had no idea he was active on dewiki. I thought he had been inactive because of health reasons as stated on his meta page. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 17:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Re-enforcing my comment, in full agreeance with Ajraddatz. Axpde performed, in the 1 year and 4 months he has been steward, no global locks & blocks up to today and a very limited amount of rights changes, a majority of which on test-wikis. There are also quite a few actions/opinions taken by Axpde with which I disagree, adittionally to the diff provided by Jafeluv, such as redirecting your talkpage to your main userpage cross-wiki, thus making communicating with you more complicated for non-English speakers, test-wiki hat-collecting, inmature reactions, abuse of rollback, considering stewards the only trusted users, uncivil reactions and inconsistent actions regarding his own global rights. (These are just a few examples I found looking through his talkpage) The user has also not either yet explained why the inactivity did not affect his homewikis. Sa vh ^ñ 16:16, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Remove: Personally I think any steward who fails to create a confirmation statement should be disqualified by this point. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Didn't do much since being elected in the end of 2011. Per Jafeluv, Ajraddatz and Savh. Trijnstel_talk 22:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --cyrfaw (talk) 10:48, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral As with André. No statement does not look very convincing. However the user says he's away for health reasons and I know how that can be utterly annoying. Would you like to continue helping here? -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:14, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per recent events such as this wrong removal of rights IMHO. Not suggesting that the requesting user was lying but removal requests without community discussion should be placed by the requesting user. The links given in the request does not mention explicitly a request for rights removal (just a retirement). I'd not have performed that without user confirmation (even the link provided in this diff is private but even if it were public, valid requests should go to SRP). I mean, there's no way to confirm the truly validity of the request. Also there's a record of you performing actions without consensus such as (this recent one) that concerns me. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 23:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Sorry but your too inactive. Techman224^Talk 21:17, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per inactivity.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 06:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC) Keep. Looks like you are back now and as that issue with protecting your own user talk page is past, I can see no reasons to remove.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 02:47, 16 February 2013 (UTC) Neutral. Not sure.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 05:29, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Inactivity due to force majeur. Activity on home-wiki is different matter, as some people prefer the comfort of their mother tongue. Plus, now he has written his statement and still have the willingness. Like a wise Wikimedian once told me, an inactive admin/steward is still better than an active admin/steward who abuse the tool. ✒ Bennylin 16:01, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with the request to resign if you'll have no time to go on being a steward. --Vituzzu (talk) 23:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Qalsın. --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 04:56, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Was inactive due to health reasons. --Millosh (talk) 09:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above --Iste (D) 10:37, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. -Zyephyrus (talk) 08:18, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep more activity, would be good; that said personal health comes first, and way above being a steward (per Vituzzu) — billinghurst sDrewth 13:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. --Wnme (talk) 17:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there is a thing known as real life, which can hinder a lot of stuff :| Hurricanefan24 (talk) 17:59, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Snowolf and Jafeluv: quite a tendency to the "I have the powers and I'll use them just for the sake of it", IMHO. --Nemo 05:49, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Still chance to be more active.--Jusjih (talk) 13:12, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I am afraid but the recent spurt of activity is likely to die out after the election. I think you should take time out of the stewards duties and return when you are really ready. Ruslik (talk) 19:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Very active. --N KOzi^Talk 19:33, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pro, agreeing with Bennylin. Ich stimme mit Bennylin überein. However, I hope you're able to do a few more actions this year. πr² (t • c) 18:14, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]