Research:Wikimedia France Research Award/Voting results
Process
[edit]- Each Wikimedian can vote for two papers max. End of the voting period March 11th, 2013.
- After the closing of the poll, votes are tallied and papers are ranked (number one being the paper with the most votes…).
- The Condorcet method is used to find the winner, with a condorcet with the jury ranking and the Wikimedian’s ranking. If there is a draw, the Wikimedian’s ranking prevails.
See all summaries of the papers here.
Jury ranking (8 voters)
[edit]- Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with history flow Visualizations
- DBpedia: A Nucleus for a Web of Open Data
- A Content-Driven Reputation System for the Wikipedia
- Creating, destroying, and restoring value in Wikipedia
- Can history be open source? Wikipedia and the future of the past
Wikimedians ranking (27 voters)
[edit]- Can history be open source? Wikipedia and the future of the past
- 2 papers ex æquo : DBpedia: A Nucleus for a Web of Open Data, Creating, destroying, and restoring value in Wikipedia
- Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with history flow Visualizations
- A Content-Driven Reputation System for the Wikipedia
Final ranking with the Condorcet method
[edit]4 papers ex æquo in the lead :
- Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with history flow Visualizations ; DBpedia: A Nucleus for a Web of Open Data ; Creating, destroying, and restoring value in Wikipedia ; Can history be open source? Wikipedia and the future of the past
- A Content-Driven Reputation System for the Wikipedia
Voting results
[edit]In case of a tie, the community's vote prevails to jury's vote, the winner is:
Can history be open source? Wikipedia and the future of the past