Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Polabian 2
Appearance
Polabian Wikipedia/Wiktionary
[edit]submitted | verification | final decision |
This proposal has been closed as part of a reform of the request process. This request has not necessarily been rejected, and new requests are welcome. This decision was taken by the language committee in accordance with the Language proposal policy. The closing committee member provided the following comment: This discussion was created before the implementation of the Language proposal policy, and it is incompatible with the policy. Please open a new proposal in the format this page has been converted to (see the instructions). Do not copy discussion wholesale, although you are free to link to it or summarise it (feel free to copy your own comments over). —{admin} Pathoschild 02:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
Proposal summary |
---|
Please read the handbook for requesters for help using this template correctly. |
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
According to Ethnologue Polabian is an extinct language. GerardM 21:57, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- So are some others, sometimes cause they was forbidden. If this language gets some supporters from the region it can work. --Peter Littmann 17:11, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support--Vladyslav Savelo 03:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral I know the situation in europe during the past and provide my support for all community based languages.
- I am in contact with a professional slawist on the german wikipedia. He asked me: Who should contribute texts to a wikipedia of a nearly unknown language?
--Peter Littmann 13:01, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - It's an extinct langauage as Gerard said above. I also don't see any signs of a large group of people who can write in this language and will be interested to join. Jeroenvrp 16:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose While I do not essentially oppose wikis in extinct languages, I think an extinct language should either be classical (like Latin) or be the subject of a revival movement (like Cornish). Polabian is neither, so I don't see what goals it might support. Steinbach (formerly Caesarion) 17:00, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose per above Baristarim 00:28, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support Polabian to recover -- MinionComma 20:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support There are a lot of Wikipedias in extinct languages, why Polabian not? Me, and a lot of other people, want to know MORE about this language. Polabian will nobody disturb! 89.48.134.51 22:20, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose For my knowledge the language is only preserved in three glossaries, that were collected shortly before the extinction of the language 250 years ago. I think, the word pool is too little for a Wikipedia. It is not possible to use the language without newly inventing big parts of it. --::Slomox:: >< 14:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.