Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Phoenician
Appearance
Phoenician Wikipedia
[edit]- See also the second request (rejected).
submitted | verification | final decision |
This proposal has been closed as part of a reform of the request process. This request has not necessarily been rejected, and new requests are welcome. This decision was taken by the language committee in accordance with the Language proposal policy. The closing committee member provided the following comment: This discussion was created before the implementation of the Language proposal policy, and it is incompatible with the policy. Please open a new proposal in the format this page has been converted to (see the instructions). Do not copy discussion wholesale, although you are free to link to it or summarise it (feel free to copy your own comments over). —{admin} Pathoschild 02:26, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
Proposal summary |
---|
|
Please read the handbook for requesters for help using this template correctly. |
- Number of speakers: Extinct
Support
[edit]- Support For sure, if we accept extinct languages that were important this one must exist. --Zabumon 22:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Support This language is in need to be revive as this language is unique and distinct from Hebrew. If a dead languages like Polabian is being on request for revival as a Wikipedia, and sooner or later as a spoken language again, so must Phoenician languages too. — Lokey3310 10:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Oppose
[edit]- Oppose A dead language. Rakuten06 22:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Neutral
[edit]- Neutral Is Phoenician so important? There isn't even an Ancient Greek Wikipedia, so I don't see why we'd need a Phoenician version so badly. You'd better gather a lot of willing contributors and build a flourishing test wiki, then you might (mind: might) change my mind. Steinbach (formerly Caesarion) 10:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)