Requests for comment/Unblock BukhariSaeed on English Wikipedia

The following request for comments is closed. The request for comment period is over.

I am indefinitly block on Eng wikipedia for sock puppetry & on simple wikipedia for edit warring. I already request at english & simple wikipedia but they have rejected my request. I am completely changed now & able to understands the all rules of wikipedia. I am currently editing on urwiki and my edits are highly constructive, you can ask from any Bureaucrat of urwiki. Few examples of my work Charles William Forman (Feature article) & John of Damascus (Good article). Thanks.--Bukhari ^Talk 12:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support, though the Meta-wiki has no power over the English Wikipedia and this is only symbolic, so this request for comment is useless. But I still morally support you. --Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (My global lock 🔒) (My global unlock 🔓) 10:39, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your block on simple.wikipedia was based on the one-strike policy. There was absolutely no way you were going to be unblocked. You recently requested an unblock at en.wikipedia, though it was revealed you had violated your block in the last six months, making you ineligible for the standard offer. What has changed in the last month? Zhangj1079 ^talk 01:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know that was my mistake, when I was blocked by Simple English or English Wikipedia, it was my early period and I did not know the rules & policies. --Bukhari ^Talk 05:34, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're not exactly answering this. You requested an unblock in November, which was opposed to. There, it was revealed you were continuing to sock in September and therefore circumventing your block. I'm assuming that you knew the policies quite well by that point in time. Around two months had passed since that request, nothing with your request has seemed to change. Zhangj1079 ^talk 14:05, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Zhangj1079: "There, it was revealed you were continuing to sock in September and therefore circumventing your block." (sock) if you are talking about sock ips then please read my last comment on my en.wiki talkpage hope you will understand. Thanks.--Bukhari ^Talk 15:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support I respect any decision by English Wikipedia sysops, I as one of the bureaucrats on Urdu Wikipedia have to admit the highly constructive nature of his edits there. He's very active, cooperative and understanding. This user has made significant contributions on Urdu Wikipedia, especially in connection with theology and more specifically about Christianity. He appears to be neutral, moderate and secular in his views, takes criticism positively and strives for more better contributions. Muhammad Shuaib (talk) 06:49, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've checked User:BukhariSaeed's contributions at the Urdu Wikipedia and the Wikidata. [IMO] Stating his interest in Christianity related articles and secularism is apparently meant to woo the administrators etc. (by assuming they're Christians). Anyhow, his edits are positive and he has learnt from his mistakes. I see no reason at the momemt to distrust him. I believe he should get a chance to prove himself. Samee (talk) 23:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is not Meta's place to tell English Wikipedia to unblock users. (Disclosure: I am an English Wikipedia admin, and a former Meta admin/steward). --Rs chen 7754 05:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Rschen7754: i really appreciate your adminship on enwik/wikidata & former adminship on Meta, & respect all sysops but no one is understanding my good intentions. Please check my ur.wiki contributions, i know Meta is not the right place to request. Everybody makes mistakes and I believe i too should get at least one chance. --Bukhari ^Talk 10:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

قانا میں شادی, معجزہ خنزیر, بیت صیدا کا نابینا, یریحو کے نزدیک نابینا کی شفا یابی, رومی افسر کے نوکر کی شفا یابی, ایک کبڑی عورت کو شفا بخشنا, وزیر کے لڑکے کا علاج, نائین کی بیوہ کے بیٹے کو زندہ کرنا, یائیر کی بیٹی کو زندہ کرنا, لعزر کو زندہ کرنا, مچھلیوں کو معجزانہ طور پر پکڑنا, یسوع کا پانی پر چلنا and طوفان کو تھمانا (all are miracles of Jesus) are examples of my work on urwiki & i am still working of Wikiproject christianity of urwiki--Bukhari ^Talk 10:45, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't generally talk about my Christian faith on Wikimedia, but I will this once. Why? To me, what matters more is following the Bible and getting along well with other editors; what doesn't matter is just saying that you're a Christian and know something about the Bible and then acting however you want. Sometimes "Christians" are the worst Wikimedia editors, and I have indefinitely blocked at least one for not following the rules (and violating copyright). And you have had many chances, and you still refuse to accept the consequences of your actions by trying to evade blocks and trying to forum shop to be unblocked. No, I do not support an unblock. --Rs chen 7754 19:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think Everybody makes mistakes and I believe i too should get at least one chance. First of all i was blocked for sockpuppetry, & en.wiki not give me a single chance after block. I think en.wiki should give me atleast one chance. BTW i gave you examples of my work on urwiki (pretending that i am neutral) and nothing else.--Bukhari ^Talk 09:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Rschen7754's original rationale, if not his later one. Mahir256 (talk) 07:00, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]