Requests for comment/Turkish Wikipedia Faulty CheckUser operation

This is a subpage; for more information, see the Requests for comments page.

Hello, I am a user who was previously banned from the Turkish Wikipedia for live sockpuppetry. In order to circumvent this ban, I used sockpuppetry once. As a result of this sockpuppetry, my message page on the local wiki is closed. Recently, CheckUser said that another user was my sockpuppet and that user was blocked. I was under reasonable suspicion for sockpuppeting, but I learned from my mistake and decided not to sockpuppet again. User:Ehlal, who is allegedly mine, is unjustly blocked. It is argued that I am untrustworthy in the eyes of the community due to persistent sockpuppetry, and that I should be stripped of my privileges on Turkish Wikiquote. I will not be upset if the community decides to strip me of my privileges, but it would be upsetting if the community decides to do so because of puppetry that I did not do. Although I pointed out to CheckUser via meta that I am not the same person as user Ehlal, he closed the solution by stating that he would report me if I continued to write for things on trwiki. I am willing to share my credentials to prove that we are two different people on the condition that this information remains confidential, but I don't know with whom I can do this process. Mustafa MVC (talk) 14:34, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~I advise to stick to one account. Ahri Boy (talk) 16:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

What does this have to do with anything? I am aware that I have made mistakes before, but I have not repeated this mistake and I am victimized. Mustafa MVC (talk) 19:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just complain to U4C. Ahri Boy (talk) 03:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Ahri Boy, I did that now. Mustafa MVC (talk) 15:27, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ahri Boy, in the future, don't respond to something you clearly don't understand. --SHB2000 (t • c) 09:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arhi Boy, stop yapping about things you clearly know nothing about. You have been warned a myriad of times in the past. There is always a possibility of misreading or misrepresentation of all private data a user check obtains. Sadly, data was not shared on checkuserwiki so I could judge on whether the block was justified. Best regards, A09|(pogovor) 20:54, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh... I was on a wikibreak. Sorry about that. I would consider disengaging from replying to further high-profile CheckUser-related complaints. Ahri Boy (talk) 11:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I would consider disengaging from replying to further high-profile CheckUser-related complaints" – no, you shouldn't "just consider", you should disengage. --SHB2000 (t • c) 10:35, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]