Quality
 | This page is kept for historical interest. Any policies mentioned may be obsolete. If you want to revive the topic, you can use the talk page or start a discussion on the community forum. |
NOTE: There is active discussion regarding this topic at the strategy wiki.
2. Quality. The quality of information provided by our projects is in
general good, and is continually improving. Nonetheless, we need to
do everything we can to ensure what we're offering people is
consistently excellent. The goal of the "Quality" Working Group will
be to make sure our materials are as high-quality as possible. Some
Sub-Group mandates might include:
Questions
[edit]How can we effectively and scalably work with institutions that control the copyright for educational/informational materials, to encourage them to release those materials under a free license?
[edit]- (your answer here ... )
How can we effectively and scalably work with academic institutions and other organizations with subject-matter-expertise, to encourage them to help improve the quality of the material we provide?
[edit]- (your answer here ... )
How can we better prevent editing that hurts quality (e.g., vandalism and malicious edits), and fix it when it occurs?
[edit]- (your answer here ... )
How can we encourage readers to help us identify poor quality material, and once it is reported, how can we best get it assessed and fixed?
[edit]- (your answer here ... )
Original source
[edit]