Meta talk:Administrators/Removal (inactivity)/October 2022
Add topicLatest comment: 2 years ago by Krd in topic Sources
Sources
[edit]- User:Krd/inactive admins (Dschwen and Putnik are only interface admins, so the I-A inactivity rules apply: fewer than 10 global edits in the last 6 months; they have made more).
- quarry:query/67829
--MF-W 12:05, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- @MF-Warburg Given the inclusion of edit content model right being given to TA per discussion on Meta talk:Babylon, do we still consider edit content model as a sysop action or a TA level action. I don't think this round of AAR this will affect anything but just asking in future runs. Thanks. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 06:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- + Since Requests_for_comment/Policy#Closure_of_RFCs RFC can only be closed by admins, a close is technically an admin action. Just to clarify. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 07:08, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- A keep decision on a deletion request also is an action done only by admins, though it is usually not counted as admin action, and I think for good reason. Besides nobody is able to count that, it created room for endless fruitless discussion. Barriers are low, so no reason to complicate this even more. --Krd 07:47, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- + Since Requests_for_comment/Policy#Closure_of_RFCs RFC can only be closed by admins, a close is technically an admin action. Just to clarify. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 07:08, 4 October 2022 (UTC)