Meta:Requests for bureaucratship/Matanya

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Matanya

Matanya (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

Hello, I'm an admin here for some months, and I would like to help with local stuff such as rights changes, bot approval etc. I'm the official bot reviewer at hewiki since November 2010 as can be seen here: [1] and as part of my steward work and admin work I'm very familiar with rights and so on. Thanks for your time and consideration. Matanya 21:43, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes why not. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely Support Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 21:53, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No reason why not. Crat endorse -Barras 22:05, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. Matanya, you already do so many things, I hope you don't tire yourself out. Keep kicking vandals. ;) Theo10011 22:14, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great candidate, though I still think Meta has really enough bureaucrats... Trijnstel 22:20, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Per Theo, crat endorse. -- Menti fisto 22:22, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course -Striker ^talk 22:31, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Trijnstel, as always :) micki t 23:00, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Crat endorse, though I still think that stews should get those rights without requests. --WizardOfOz ^talk 23:14, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - We really need to stop this nonsense with having to vote on Stewards for this. Can't we just approve those proposals I've been shouting about for 2 years to give Stewards all local rights here for at least the term they are Stewards because THEY ARE STEWARDS. I mean, come on. They already received a lot of scrutiny and support from the community. Why do we need to reconfirm that they should be trusted with tools that we already said they are trusted with. Blarg. Ottava Rima (talk) 02:33, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure.” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 03:27, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --minhhuy ^(talk) (WMF) 03:44, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, helpful. Sa vh ^ñ 09:16, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No problems for me too. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 10:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vituzzu 14:54, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, even with the big need for bureaucrats these days ;-) Ajraddatz (Talk) 15:35, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Closed as succesful --WizardOfOz ^talk 20:43, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]