Meta:Requests for adminship/Trijnstel
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.
No opposes, clear consensus to promote. Successful RfA. Alex Pereira falaê 14:09, 31 March 2011 (UTC) ·[reply]
- Trijnstel (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)
- End date: 14:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello all! I'm here today to nominate Trijnstel for adminship here on meta. She's tagged many pages for deletion here and also reverted lots of vandalism. As a sysop on nlwiki, she also fulfils the requirements. Trijnstel furthermore is already a global rollbacker. I think she has shown some need for the mop here and is also trusted enough to be an admin. I hope you agree with me. Good luck! -Barras 14:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for nominating me and of course I accept it. With love, Trijnstel 14:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - as nom... -Barras 14:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Active cross-wiki user, sysop on nlwiki and judging by the deleted contributions could make use of the tools here as well. Jafeluv 14:11, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Sure mickit 14:28, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --WizardOfOz talk 14:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Sure. Theo10011 15:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, of course - Hoo man (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Seen her around quite a bit doing small wiki work, no reason why not. Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Natuurlijk, trustful and active. Savhñ 21:02, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure. --Erwin 21:31, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Grunny (talk) 00:00, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Don't see a reason to oppose. –BruTe talk 05:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Why not? -FASTILY (TALK) 07:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Obviously yes. :) Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 08:05, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --თოგო (D) 12:33, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Alex Pereira falaê 17:16, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support –Juliancolton | Talk 19:39, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Além do que foi dito, ela é bastante cuidadosa e respeitosa.” Teles (Talk @ C G) 05:52, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--Anton 008 08:07, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support fr33kman 06:26, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Theo10011 10:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Oops, Theo seems a great fan of Trijnstel, therefore voted twice (see the fifth support). :P — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 17:29, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 02:45, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I was planning to nom you too , welcome to admin gang band Mardetanha talk 17:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. -- Dferg ☎ talk 17:49, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - porque non? muy Kissankellon! MoiraMoira 20:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- Maximillion Pegasus 20:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Sure - Jarii94 20:47, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support; quite active. -- Mentifisto 20:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support yes ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 03:38, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Hydriz 14:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--Sokac121 18:45, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Good use of the mop on nlwiki, no problems with the mop on meta - TBloemink 19:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Aude 23:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]