Meta:Requests for CentralNotice adminship/Multichill
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.
- Multichill (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)
- Please assign me the CentralNotice so I can help out with the Wiki Loves Monuments banners. Last couple of years I had temp adminship for this, but this seems to better suit my needs. And no, I'm not going to create a subpage for this request. Multichill (talk) 19:34, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- All RfXs have subpages so they can be archived. I don't know why it is so hard to create a subpage like this... -Barras talk 21:36, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- What else are you not going to do? I hope you're going to respect all the rules? I'm sorry for this question, i hope it would not offend you, but your statement without explanation why are you not going to create seems to be quite weird for me so I wan't to make it clear for me. --Base (talk) 16:02, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- Mutichill, you know quite well this is not the way to work with a community. You are asking for user rights with a 2 line request, one of which you use to state that you will not even be creating a sub-page or following the procedure here. I'll
Oppose you for now based on that alone. Theo10011 (talk) 13:41, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Having looked at WLM and Multichill's excellent work both in that area and on Commons, where he has a strong bot track record, in the past, I'm fine with the request. It was uncontroversial last year and so it should be now. Said that, elaborating the statement a bit for folks that don't come with such foreknowledge could indeed be helpful. Regards, --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 02:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per Theo. Not a constructive way to ask for permission, nor does he really appear to have a legitimate need for it. -FASTILY 06:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
- Per the comments above, there is no consensus to grant centralnotice adminship. -Barras talk 08:47, 21 August 2013 (UTC)