Image filter referendum/Results/zh-hant
投票結果已於2011年9月1日公佈。
In other languages: Acèh (ace) العربية (ar) azərbaycanca (az) беларуская (be) বাংলা (bn) български (bg) català (ca) čeština (cs) dansk (da) Deutsch (de) English (en) español (es) eesti (et) فارسی (fa) suomi (fi) français (fr) עברית (he) हिन्दी (hi) hrvatski (hr) magyar (hu) հայերեն (hy) Bahasa Indonesia (id) italiano (it) 日本語 (ja) Jawa (jv) اردو (ur) ქართული (ka) 한국어 (ko) kurdî (ku) Lëtzebuergesch (lb) മലയാളം (ml) Bahasa Melayu (ms) नेपाली (ne) Nederlands (nl) norsk (no) ଓଡ଼ିଆ (or) polski (pl) português (pt) română (ro) русский (ru) සිංහල (si) Soomaaliga (so) slovenčina (sk) српски / srpski (sr) srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски (sh) shqip (sq) Sunda (su) svenska (sv) ślůnski (szl) తెలుగు (te) ไทย (th) Tagalog (tl) Türkçe (tr) українська (uk) oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча (uz) Tiếng Việt (vi) 粵語 (yue) 中文（简体） (zh-hans) 中文（繁體） (zh-hant) தமிழ் (ta) [edit]
| 組織 |
|---|
簡介
[edit]此一初步且暫時性的報告由個人圖片隱藏功能公投選舉委員會出版與散佈，而一旦最終分析完成將會再出版一份完整的報告。而此一分析所需的資料由Software in the Public Interest（SPI）所提供，為中立可信的第三方，持有加密用的安全金鑰且直到投票結束時才解密。這裡所公開的總計數據由SPI的財務主管Michael Schultheiss所擔保。
委員會感謝SPI的Michael Schultheiss勤勉且及時的協助以及WMF的Andrew Garrett提供的科技協助與專門知識。
結果
[edit]本次投票總計有24146張票，為維基媒體基金會所舉行之類似活動中有最高投票率的一次。其中有123張作廢，包括3張委員會的測試票，故有效票為24023張，而這些廢票是由於確認為蓄意或不小心重覆投票所以作廢。此外投票總數並不包括因用戶再次進入投票頁而自動取消的選票。
底下有兩個關於這次投票的章節，首先是投票者對於由一系列問題裡的六項陳述各自的同意程度，分為0到10個等級（10表示強力支持），第二章節則是自由撰寫評論的部分。而在這兩個章節底下都各自的分析與討論。
數據結果
[edit]第一部分的問題之數據：
- 為讀者提供這項功能對維基計畫來說是具重要性的。
- （It is important for the Wikimedia projects to offer this feature to readers.）
| ? 總計 |
0 總計 |
1 總計 |
2 總計 |
3 總計 |
4 總計 |
5 總計 |
6 總計 |
7 總計 |
8 總計 |
9 總計 |
10 總計 |
票數 | 標有偏好程度的票數 | 偏好程度平均值 | 中位數 |
| 269 | 3763 | 790 | 1163 | 978 | 715 | 2819 | 1800 | 2670 | 2957 | 1308 | 4791 | 24023 | 23754 | 5.7 | 6 |
| 1.12% | 15.66% | 3.29% | 4.84% | 4.07% | 2.98% | 11.73% | 7.49% | 11.11% | 12.31% | 5.44% | 19.94% |
- 已登入與未登入的讀者都能使用這項功能是很重要的。
- （It is important that the feature be usable by both logged-in and logged-out readers.）
| ? 總計 |
0 總計 |
1 總計 |
2 總計 |
3 總計 |
4 總計 |
5 總計 |
6 總計 |
7 總計 |
8 總計 |
9 總計 |
10 總計 |
票數 | 標有偏好程度的票數 | 偏好程度平均值 | 中位數 |
| 627 | 3394 | 630 | 852 | 715 | 572 | 2393 | 1115 | 1921 | 2682 | 1947 | 7175 | 24023 | 23396 | 6.4 | 8 |
| 2.61% | 14.13% | 2.62% | 3.55% | 2.98% | 2.38% | 9.96% | 4.64% | 8.00% | 11.16% | 8.10% | 29.87% |
- 個人能夠提報或標記一些他們覺得有爭議但尚未被歸類為需要過濾的圖片是很重要的。
- （It is important that individuals be able to report or flag images that they see as controversial, that have not yet been categorized as such.）
| ? 總計 |
0 總計 |
1 總計 |
2 總計 |
3 總計 |
4 總計 |
5 總計 |
6 總計 |
7 總計 |
8 總計 |
9 總計 |
10 總計 |
票數 | 標有偏好程度的票數 | 偏好程度平均值 | 中位數 |
| 614 | 2809 | 617 | 829 | 684 | 697 | 2159 | 1790 | 2602 | 3405 | 2137 | 5680 | 24023 | 23409 | 6.4 | 7 |
| 2.56% | 11.69% | 2.57% | 3.45% | 2.85% | 2.90% | 8.99% | 7.45% | 10.83% | 14.17% | 8.90% | 23.64% |
- 這項功能在文化方面保持中立是重要的
- 該功能在關於具有潛在爭議的意象上應盡可能反映全球性或多文化的觀點。
- （It is important that the feature be culturally neutral
- as much as possible, it should aim to reflect a global or multicultural view of what imagery is potentially controversial.）
| ? 總計 |
0 總計 |
1 總計 |
2 總計 |
3 總計 |
4 總計 |
5 總計 |
6 總計 |
7 總計 |
8 總計 |
9 總計 |
10 總計 |
票數 | 標有偏好程度的票數 | 偏好程度平均值 | 中位數 |
| 1399 | 2048 | 350 | 466 | 394 | 507 | 2134 | 895 | 1441 | 2271 | 2116 | 10002 | 24023 | 22624 | 7.4 | 9 |
| 5.82% | 8.53% | 1.46% | 1.94% | 1.64% | 2.11% | 8.88% | 3.73% | 6.00% | 9.45% | 8.81% | 41.64% |
- 隱藏狀態可逆是很重要的
- 讀者如果決定改變他們的想法應受到支持。
- （It is important that hiding be reversible
- readers should be supported if they decide to change their minds.）
| ? 總計 |
0 總計 |
1 總計 |
2 總計 |
3 總計 |
4 總計 |
5 總計 |
6 總計 |
7 總計 |
8 總計 |
9 總計 |
10 總計 |
票數 | 標有偏好程度的票數 | 偏好程度平均值 | 中位數 |
| 471 | 548 | 40 | 63 | 61 | 70 | 433 | 253 | 551 | 1383 | 1812 | 18338 | 24023 | 23552 | 9.3 | 10 |
| 1.96% | 2.28% | 0.17% | 0.26% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 1.80% | 1.05% | 2.29% | 5.76% | 7.54% | 76.34% |
- 這項功能可讓讀者可以迅速且輕易選擇他們想讓哪一種圖片被隱藏（例如有5到10種分類），好比說人們可以選擇隱藏性意象的圖片而不隱藏暴力意象的圖片。
- （It is important that the feature allow readers to quickly and easily choose which types of images they want to hide (e.g., 5-10 categories), so that people could choose for example to hide sexual imagery but not violent imagery.）
| ? 總計 |
0 總計 |
1 總計 |
2 總計 |
3 總計 |
4 總計 |
5 總計 |
6 總計 |
7 總計 |
8 總計 |
9 總計 |
10 總計 |
票數 | 標有偏好程度的票數 | 偏好程度平均值 | 中位數 |
| 595 | 2193 | 359 | 442 | 407 | 434 | 1804 | 1260 | 2399 | 3662 | 2890 | 7578 | 24023 | 23428 | 7.2 | 8 |
| 2.48% | 9.13% | 1.49% | 1.84% | 1.69% | 1.81% | 7.51% | 5.24% | 9.99% | 15.24% | 12.03% | 31.54% |
分析
[edit]Of those who expressed a preference in their votes (that is, they voted anything other than “not enough information”), the community expressed the overwhelming desire that the hiding feature be reversible (median 10), strong support for the suggestion that readers could easily and quickly choose categories (median 8), that the feature be culturally neutral (median 9), and that both logged in and logged out users have access to the feature (median 8). Voters expressed slightly less support for the notion that readers could flag images (median 7). Support for reversible hiding was completely clear, while the other vote distributions were bimodal to varying degrees, most notably for overall importance.
With regard to the assessment of the importance of the filter by respondents, some further analysis was done. The average vote on this question (among those who held an opinion) was 5.74, and the median vote was 6, indicating that a greater number of respondents considered this to be important than unimportant, though the difference is not overwhelming. Of the 8464 voters (35.6% of the total 23754) who rated this either a 10 or a 0, 4791 voters (56.6%) rated it a “10” and 3763 votes (43.4%) rated it a “0”.
A further analysis of the responses to the “importance” question, comparing votes at the extremes of the spectrum, working towards the middle, revealed the following results:
| 結果 | 結果 | 總計 | |
| "10" | "0" | ||
| 票數 | 4791 (56.6%) | 3763 (43.4%) | |
| "10+9" | "0 + 1" | ||
| 票數 | 6099 (57.2%) | 4553 (42.8%) | 10652 |
| "10 + 9 + 8" | "0 + 1 + 2" | ||
| 票數 | 9056 (61.3%) | 5716 (38.7%) | 14772 |
| "10 + 9 + 8 + 7" | "0 + 1 + 2 + 3" | ||
| 票數 | 11726 (63.6%) | 6694 (36.4%) | 18420 |
| "10 + 9 + 8 + 7 + 6" | "0 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4" | ||
| 票數 | 13526 (64.6%) | 7409 (35.4%) | 20935 |
The committee also notes the significant number of “0” votes cast for all but one question (ranging from 9% to 16%), which suggests the presence of a sizable number of voters who wished to express their opposition to the basic idea of the image hiding feature. This voting pattern coincides with the anecdotal evidence of both the comments to the Meta page on the feature and the sampled comments of the plebiscite itself.
評論一節的結果
[edit]A total of 6956 users added free text comments to their votes (29% of all voters). Of these, a representative sample of 1298 comments (19%) underwent a preliminary review in order to gauge and analyze the tone and content of the comment. The remaining comments will continue to be analyzed by the committee. In addition, word frequency charts were run on the full set of comments.
Methodological note: the sample to be analyzed was created by numbering the comments sequentially in the order in which they were received and then generating a list of random numbers from atmospheric noise using http://www.random.org/integers/. The numbers generated by the randomization process were matched to comment numbers and those comments were analyzed. Translations were obtained by asking native or high fluency speakers for translations. Initial issues with importing unicode characters were resolved in time to include some of those comments in analysis. Because multiple evaluators participated in the review process, a small set of comments was evaluated several times by multiple people to ensure consistency in rating. That set was removed prior to reporting these numbers.
141 words were used more than 500 times in the full set of comments. Below is a table showing most frequent word use and count. Note that differences using modifiers such as “not” were analyzed as well. For instance, the word “controversial” appears 1143 times in the comments, with 19 instances of “non-controversial”, 11 instances of “uncontroversial”, 2 of “noncontroversial”, 1 of “not-controversial”, 1 of “not-so-controversial”, and 7 of “not controversial”. These numbers are representative of other modifiers sampled. These modifiers make up a small but significant percent of the words and should be evaluated more fully for the committee’s final report.
The committee was heartened to see that many non-English words were represented in the table of most frequently used words.
Of the 1298 comment samples rated for tone, 387 (29.82%) had a positive tone, 376 (28.97%) had a neutral tone, and 535 (41.22%) had a negative tone.
The committee was interested in a particular subset of those who used a positive tone in their comments, in particular whether the commenter made reference to whether they personally intended to use the image filter or whether they believed it was a valuable tool for others. Of that set of “positive tone” comments, 32 (18% of the subset, 2.05% of the full set) made reference to the tool as though it would be of use to the respondent personally. Another 143 (82% of the subset, 9.16% of the full set) referenced the tool as though it would be of use to others.
Comments were also reviewed to identify references to voting problems or issues with the design of the voting process/plebiscite. There were 2 references (0.13%) to voting problems in the reviewed set, and 45 (2.88%) references to concerns with the referendum process itself.
The reviewers further looked for comments that provided particular input as to implementation details, such as suggestions for categorization schemes or other ideas to be provided to the design team. There were 389 such comments in the comment set that was analyzed (24.92%).
In the context of analysis of the comments, one trend emerged very clearly: the negative comments more frequently mentioned objections on a philosophical basis, while positive comments more frequently mentioned practical concerns.
討論
[edit]The committee is pleased overall with the use of the free text comment field. Although text-based comments provide a challenge for evaluative purposes, the value gained from this field in informing the design process is substantial. The committee wishes to also clearly state that it is fully committed to reading and evaluating every comment, and design/implementation suggestions will be anonymized and passed on to the design team.
Some comments include personally identifiable data, so the committee regrets to advise that a full dump can not be released at this time. It is our hope that a more full and scholarly analysis can be done at a later date.
下一步會怎樣？
[edit]The numeric results detailing responses to the six statements are now complete and will not be amended in future reports.
The committee will continue to review and analyze the free-text comments, and will issue a final report once this task is complete.
For the Personal Image Filter Referendum Committee,
Risker 01:56, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
附錄
[edit]詞語頻率表
|
|
|