Jump to content

Grants talk:Programs/Wikimedia Research Fund/Wikidata for the People of Africa

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 11 days ago by Bovlb in topic Review of Wikidata editors

If possible, please keep your input concise. We'd particularly like feedback on the following questions:

  1. From what perspective or in what role are you providing your input? (For example: a Wikipedia editor, a representative of a Wikimedia chapter, a member of a regional committee)
  2. In what ways do you think this research can support members of the Wikimedia communities in their work on Wikimedia projects?
  3. Is there a particular project or affiliate in your country/region/project that can benefit from the result of this research and/or you recommend that the applicants seek to coordinate or collaborate with? If so, please provide details including the name of the project or affiliate and a short description of the relevance of the proposal to the needs of the affiliate or project.
  4. Do you have any other comments or feedback you would like to share with the Research Fund chairs?

Review of Wikidata editors[edit]

This project is primarily concerned with Wikidata so, as a Wikidata administrator, I have assessed the records of the project participants on that project. So far as I can see, the project proposal does not claim any technical expertise by project participants in editing Wikidata. I was only able to identify accounts for two project participants:

  • Neutral Neutral LauretteMarais: They have no contributions at Wikidata
  • Neutral Neutral AarneRanta: In 2021, they made a handful of edits following a tutorial, but they have made no substantive contributions to Wikidata.

I recommend that we do not fund Wikidata projects unless the project participants can establish a significant history of working on Wikidata within the community norms. This proposal does not qualify. Bovlb (talk) 23:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply