Grants talk:Committees/Committee Open Call/US & Canada Candidates

Comments from J.zht

IN VIEW OF

Approved by the WMF Board of Trustees.Research Report Based on Intensified Planning Process :

Q What country are you based in? My birthplace is close to Asia. Pacific Second Island Chain Buffer Area。GPS 搜尋 國際換日線Graduated from the department of advertising and design, I has been engaged in service-related work. Valid occupational certificate: 1.Have the national professional general "fire management personnel certificate" (every 2 years need to be re-examined, replace the valid certificate). Type A Construction Industry Occupational Supervisor Labor Environment, Health, Safety and Health Management Licence (re-examined every 4 years, valid license replacement). Language Proficiency Please refer to My User Readme Information

Tell us about yourself and why you want to join a Regional Committee.

我帶著私人的目的而來，因為我的手機時常發生針對性質的人為造成的 無法連結互聯網絡、聯網中斷、瀏覽網站時遇上互動式AI自動生成的回覆內容，我來維基媒體主要目的本來只是閱讀驗證做其他的私人網站得到的資料是否一致。只是因為在中文維基百科看到的是譯文，計算機科學是西方社會引進的，所以我已經在這裏11年了、不編輯，但是不編輯 好幾次 IP塊 全域被封禁 ，期限：永久。 全域搬遷的那個時候被橫幅廣告招攬測試人員。我不會編碼、測試人員的經驗我有，我是Windons 10 測試人員之一。2014年算是微軟電腦的半個無償員工，但是微軟電腦公司的作法讓我感到很舒服，其他的軟體開發商都想要免費、無償的讓消費者變成測試者、提供使用體驗。這個論調的擴張來自APACHE License 軟體開發協議條款，授權者主張版權者，提起訴訟時 許可證立即失效，我們的免責聲明，在法律實務上的提前拋棄的責任、人權不可拋棄，因為這一條款是二戰聯盟國的首領共同帶頭簽署了停戰協定、人權公約。我的觀念是作為一個知識社區該有的底線就是不能有商業的鴕鳥心態，維基百科上常常看到：事實不需要去解釋，真實發生的事情，辯論都是無力的。

1.消防管理人員 結業證書，用途：消防安全法規定：公共場所必需有一名持有該證書、每年進行查核工作。豁免條款：保全管理公司駐點人員（每2年需要重新檢查一次，替換有效證書）。2025-12月 失效作廢

2甲級。 主管級 勞動場所安全衛生防護管理證照 （建築業專用）

Q What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem? 提供正確的知識是我們的服務，客戶的需求我們要提前預測他們的需要，以人為本的軸心是為他人著想。我認為真誠本就是做人處事的態度，既然因緣巧合來到了維基媒體基金會，我在觀察一些歷史存檔的時候每個年度的董事會決議案、決議，財務報表、歷年來的各種資料都可以公開的查詢，唯一沒有紀錄的只有辦公室行動，剛好我的 IP 正是被執行代碼的IP塊範圍，親身經歷過的問題就必需查清楚原由。跟著超連結的引導在通以下我複製了受託者的原始文件內容。這個回答我認同，正確的事不需要去解釋什麼、因為我覺得時間可以讓有疑問的人知道， 他說：我不想解釋什麼、客戶打電話來，無論對方是什麼背景，他都會立即去解決問題，默默的付出、以下是原文的複製： Q How do you think you could contribute towards the committees’ role and ways of working? A No one in the world has ever answered such a question without real knowledge of each other.This is a virtual platform, and this question should not arise without any authentication.Because we are completely unfamiliar with each other, the question is which person and which position are being questioned, and this question has violated the code of conduct. Q How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory? A Three elements:"[1.]to discover patterns of thinking."Where is the crux of the problem.how long it's been around, and where it's been.[2.]The concept and responsibility of decision-makers" Only when they become true founders will they understand that running a business requires unknown risk assessment and pressure.[3]Every decision maker who has authority to make a decision should be aware of the fact that he or she has to change his or her mind before making any decision. •There is no way to solve the problem by avoiding responsibility. In fact, if you can solve the problem with money, it is within the scope of corporate investors' risk assessment.People who admit their mistakes and accept failure deserve the respect of others. I'm not the only one who has my own point of view. I saw someone on Twitter at 3 a.m. today who wanted to measure Wikipedia's value with money. The founder replied that knowledge of freedom is a priceless asset.

Q How do you think the committee could improve grantmaking, so it has a greater impact? A Simplify the framework of applications, take a closer look at the purpose of each application, whether the subject matter and content of the application are plagiarized, and whether the centripetal effort of each member receiving it. "I can't get a decision-making answer without getting a question that I can deduce based on the data." ·Q What skills, background or experience could you bring to the committee? You might address grant making, knowledge equity, or other relevant areas. So far, this is the sixth question.I would also like to ask the Committee what substantive assistance it can give me in delaying my application for grants until now.I'm just curious about why I can't get a reply email!Did the grant committee in North America receive my e-mail ? 1. Whether it's a foundation member or a committee member, or any individual contributor, everyone comes from different cultures, social experiences, and skills. Everyone comes to this platform through a new internship – a period of proficiency.I think it's better for an Asian not familiar with English to start learning a second language at the age of 45, even to use the tools available to communicate with foreigners. Clarification: The above is for the purpose of answering the question, the content of the speech does not have any emotion, is simply answering the question. 2.Is it really acceptable for the rest of us to have a CEO apologize to the little administrator ? Harassment in accordance with the code of conduct is itself a violation of the rules, why the person who steps in to solve the problem should apologize to the wrong person! What kind of logic do you have? If something goes wrong on any day, you'll just give me up because all the systems are planned by me!Would anyone in your state of mind be willing to keep any of your products safe for you wholeheartedly?

開發軟體、編輯文章都不是我的擅長技能、但是我看見了這個職務徵求的公告。我認為應該在這裡貢獻些實際的回報，畢竟我來維基媒體是帶著私人的目的而在這裡停留查閱自己缺少的知識。

CONSIDERATION FACTORS

1.WMF & Global Centers are global in nature.

2.The Centre's responsibility is to carry out the WMF's mission.

REFORM

1.Meta-Wiki Its nature is to provide a global public platform, and its responsibility is to provide coordinated services for the interaction of groups and organizations in various places.

2.Therefore, Mate-Wiki is the best service website for the governance committee

3. The official name of the administrative centre is" Comprehensive Services Centre (CSC) "

4.Proposed establishment of a complete electronic instrument work inquiry system— The preceding unsigned comment was added by J.zht (talk) 16:54, 30 January 2025 (UTC)