This project is funded by a Project Grant

Report accepted

This report for a Project Grant approved in FY 2016-17 has been reviewed and accepted by the Wikimedia Foundation.

To read the approved grant submission describing the plan for this project, please visit Grants:Project/txolo/Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Perú.
You may still review or add to the discussion about this report on its talk page.
You are welcome to email projectgrantswikimedia.org at any time if you have questions or concerns about this report.

Welcome to this project's final report! This report shares the outcomes, impact and learnings from the grantee's project.

Part 1: The Project

Summary

In a few short sentences, give the main highlights of what happened with your project. Please include a few key outcomes or learnings from your project in bullet points, for readers who may not make it all the way through your report.

This year our main task has been to make known about the contest to different institutions, public and private, for their better inclusion in the cultural agendas of these places. So, the main activity has been the dissemination of the event nation wide. The contest in its 2017 edition left us fewer photographs compared to the previous edition but also left us a greater and new participation of people. We believe that from now on we will try to carry out the photographic exhibition after the month of April, which is the start date of the school and university academic year in Peru, or depending of have a nice or important place where we can do it. We planned this part of our work focused on opened spaces to meet and share the WLM experience with artistics and heritage protective collectives, in Lima and in other cities of Perú.

Project Goals

Please copy and paste the project goals from your proposal page. Under each goal, write at least three sentences about how you met that goal over the course of the project. Alternatively, if your goals changed, you may describe the change, list your new goals and explain how you met them, instead.

To strengthen the team of wikimedistas summoning participation of people who live outside of capital and to link them to the process of construction of the chapter wikimedia Peru

We just, in these days, were re-recognized as affilliate UG, so we, still are here, more strong and more actives. With more people from some institutions that will be important to us, like people from Catolical Univesity and some others wikimedians. People from other cities are in too, in our jury and as special linkers with offices of Culture Heritage.

To obtain more photographs and more participation in the WLM from Peru, also to involve new offices or public and to strengthen the relation with the ministry of culture.

We have, now, the attention and compromise of Culture Ministry to carry on up this project, in 2019 edition with more time and more plans. Start with the awards ceremony in the principal place of the Culture Ministry is a one example.

Project Impact

Important: The Wikimedia Foundation is no longer collecting Global Metrics for Project Grants. We are currently updating our pages to remove legacy references, but please ignore any that you encounter until we finish.

Targets

In the first column of the table below, please copy and paste the measures you selected to help you evaluate your project's success (see the Project Impact section of your proposal). Please use one row for each measure. If you set a numeric target for the measure, please include the number.
In the second column, describe your project's actual results. If you set a numeric target for the measure, please report numerically in this column. Otherwise, write a brief sentence summarizing your output or outcome for this measure.
In the third column, you have the option to provide further explanation as needed. You may also add additional explanation below this table.

Planned measure of success (include numeric target, if applicable)	Actual result	Explanation
To strengthen the team of wikimedistas summoning participation of people who live outside of capital and to link them to the process of construction of the chapter wikimedia Peru	We still have UG	We just, in these days, were re-recognized as affilliate UG, so we, still are here, more strong and more actives. With more people from some institutions that will be important to us, like people from Catolical Univesity and some others wikimedians. People from other cities are in too, in our jury and as special linkers with offices of Culture Heritage.
To obtain more photographs and more participation in the WLM from Peru, also to involve new offices or public and to strengthen the relation with the ministry of culture.	Culture Ministry agreed our "wlm call to participation" and shared it.	We have, now, the attention and compromise of Culture Ministry to carry on up this project, in 2019 edition with more time and more plans. Start with the awards ceremony in the principal place of the Culture Ministry is a one example.

Story

Looking back over your whole project, what did you achieve? Tell us the story of your achievements, your results, your outcomes. Focus on inspiring moments, tough challenges, interesting antecdotes or anything that highlights the outcomes of your project. Imagine that you are sharing with a friend about the achievements that matter most to you in your project.

This should not be a list of what you did. You will be asked to provide that later in the Methods and Activities section.
Consider your original goals as you write your project's story, but don't let them limit you. Your project may have important outcomes you weren't expecting. Please focus on the impact that you believe matters most.

We start our second edition of WLM in Perú with many plans and goals to achieve our project. After our first experience we had a plan to carry out this project to others specials regions in Perú, where there are a many movement around the heritage linked to tourism and travels routes.

It is so we have had several meetings with some collectives and institutions and, tourism companys too in five regions. With they we share information and plans about our second part of our project, and they showed us some interest in they participation.

Happily we had a WLM edition with more photos and more participation than the fisrt, and we were build several very nice lists about arqueological heritage from documents of Culture Ministry, so our goals in this sense was achieves.

Sadly, already in Lima again, we had very big floods in Perú, in Lima and many others parts of country, in this situation we priorized our participation in many activities to genenerate data of this towns flooded, this with OpenStreetMap Perú community and with others collectives of affected peoples.

With this situation we couldn't finished our project in that WLM edition. Thinking in the next one, that we was in time to start, We start our third edition of WLM. So we started and, continued the conversations and coordinations with some public offices to have a place to can held our expositions and awarads ceremonies form 2017 and 2018 editions. Finally we had the attention form the principal office of heritage in Culture Ministry in Perú, and a very big an immportant room in their exposition hall's. Now we hope be able to develop this exposition and carried to some other places after there.

Survey(s)

If you used surveys to evaluate the success of your project, please provide a link(s) in this section, then briefly summarize your survey results in your own words. Include three interesting outputs or outcomes that the survey revealed.

Other

Is there another way you would prefer to communicate the actual results of your project, as you understand them? You can do that here!

Methods and activities

Please provide a list of the main methods and activities through which you completed your project.

We organized this part of our work focuzed in mettings to share WLM experiencies and potentials to some citizen's collectives and governamental officers of heritages offices in Perú. With they we shared some wlm spread materials.

Activities performed: Poster printing and explanatory material about the WLM. Trips to the interior of the country for the dissemination and awareness of activities related to the cultural heritage of Peru and its inclusion in the wikimedia repositories as a strategy for their protection and for citizen participation. Sharing the experience of Wiki Loves Monuments in Peru.

In Lima. Meetings with the management team of the Mateo Salado archaeological complex, the OpenStreetMap Peru community, Salvemos las Huacas and other collectives. In order to make an editaton on the Mateo Salado Complex, place that was the site of the last exhibition and on which we gathered diverse multimedia material. https://www.facebook.com/salvemoslashuacas/videos/1432516503480502/ https://www.facebook.com/perustreetphotography/posts/2161122700581296 https://osmlatam.github.io/sotm-2017/en/#program https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8b/Jornada_de_edici%C3%B3n_sobre_el_Qhapac_%C3%91an_en_el_Complejo_Arqueol%C3%B3gico_Mateo_Salado.jpg/250px-Jornada_de_edici%C3%B3n_sobre_el_Qhapac_%C3%91an_en_el_Complejo_Arqueol%C3%B3gico_Mateo_Salado.jpg https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jornada_de_edicion_sobre_Qhapac_%C3%91an_en_Huaca_Mateo_Salado.jpg

In Lima we can organized some mettings and coordinations with the instagram community in Peru, with they we can realized how is that we can propose them some activities. The most important way is printing fotos, or editing some publications with the fotos from WLM here. https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-pe/2018-March/000080.html

Trip to Cajarmarca Although it was not possible to hold meetings with the public authorities of this place, it was possible to initiate links for future work with people who work on the cultural agenda of this city.

Trip to Iquitos In this city meetings were also held with the authorities that manage the cultural part from the public authorities and proposed more activities and an exhibition to be held in the halls of some public or private institutions. In this place, we have a meeting with some researchers from IIAP (Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonía del Perú) and with them we explore some activities in the future, about and with amazonian peoples. http://encuentrocultura.pe/5/2017/10/06/balance-general-del-5enc/

Trip to Arequipa Meetings were held with those responsible for cultural management of the Municipality of Arequipa, they also proposed the realization of more activities with these authorities and the realization of a photographic exhibition on Wiki Loves Monuments.

Trip to Puno In the city of Puno, meetings were held with members of the cultural collectives of that place, was usefull to include in our map, some organizations and specials dates, like the Candelaria celebrations and some sikuri’s groups.

Trip to Cusco One member of the our jury is from Cusco. There is the possibility to make an exhibition of the winning photographs there, at the same time there is also a possibility to carry out activities related to the collection of data related to cultural heritage of Peru. Especially archaeological. https://twitter.com/WikimediaPE/status/902566064734613507 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/es:Categor%C3%ADa:Anexo:Monumentos_de_Per%C3%BA

Project resources

Please provide links to all public, online documents and other artifacts that you created during the course of this project. Even if you have linked to them elsewhere in this report, this section serves as a centralized archive for everything you created during your project. Examples include: meeting notes, participant lists, photos or graphics uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, template messages sent to participants, wiki pages, social media (Facebook groups, Twitter accounts), datasets, surveys, questionnaires, code repositories... If possible, include a brief summary with each link.

   • https://www.facebook.com/salvemoslashuacas/videos/1432516503480502/
   • https://www.facebook.com/perustreetphotography/posts/2161122700581296 
   • https://osmlatam.github.io/sotm-2017/en/#program 
   • https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8b/Jornada_de_edici%C3%B3n_sobre_el_Qhapac_%C3%91an_en_el_Complejo_Arqueol%C3%B3gico_Mateo_Salado.jpg/250px-Jornada_de_edici%C3%B3n_sobre_el_Qhapac_%C3%91an_en_el_Complejo_Arqueol%C3%B3gico_Mateo_Salado.jpg 
   • https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jornada_de_edicion_sobre_Qhapac_%C3%91an_en_Huaca_Mateo_Salado.jpg 
   • https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor%C3%ADa:Anexo:Monumentos_de_Per%C3%BA 
   • https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complejo_arqueol%C3%B3gico_Mateo_Salado
   • https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Huaca_Mateo_Salado 
   • https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedistas_de_Per%C3%BA/Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2017 
   • https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2017_in_Peru
   • https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedistas_de_Per%C3%BA/Proyecto_Complejo_Arqueol%C3%B3gico_Mateo_Salado

Learning

The best thing about trying something new is that you learn from it. We want to follow in your footsteps and learn along with you, and we want to know that you took enough risks in your project to have learned something really interesting! Think about what recommendations you have for others who may follow in your footsteps, and use the below sections to describe what worked and what didn’t.

We've learn that we need more and better spread material, like books or some publication like it, that contain all the photos that we have since our first WLM edition, in this publication we need to give to photograohers a special space to promote its work and their contribution to WLM. For press or Heritage Institutions this kind of publications is more usefull and serious than afiches or letters invitations.

In the same time, we learn that our gobernment have betters ears in others cities than Lima, in Cusco or Arequipa, for example, we have very good response from officers, but we don’t have permanent work with they in their cities, it was common that they ask to us for organize others activities like editatons or photowalks.

What worked well

What did you try that was successful and you'd recommend others do? To help spread successful strategies so that they can be of use to others in the movement, rather than writing lots of text here, we'd like you to share your finding in the form of a link to a learning pattern.

'* Our oncoming to the Culture Ministry has opened for us some spaces to explain them the potential of WLM for social participation and attention about our heritage. On May 21, 2017, we had an interview for the Salvemos las Huacas project. In September 2018, the Peruvian news agency "Andina" published the news about the Wiki Loves Monuments. In September 2018, the Ministry of Culture of Peru published a tweet about the Wiki Loves Monuments. And facebook post: https://www.facebook.com/mincu.pe/videos/906326676421443 '

What didn’t work

What did you try that you learned didn't work? What would you think about doing differently in the future? Please list these as short bullet points.

We have a very good female members in our jury, this year we proposed one of them to the international jury but she don’t was part of this, so we couldn’t count with she in our local jury.

We could not carry out the second part of the project, because here in Peru there were very strong floods that canceled our plans and focused us on the development of responses for the emergency through collaboration with openstreetmap Péru.

Other recommendations

If you have additional recommendations or reflections that don’t fit into the above sections, please list them here.

Next steps and opportunities

Are there opportunities for future growth of this project, or new areas you have uncovered in the course of this grant that could be fruitful for more exploration (either by yourself, or others)? What ideas or suggestions do you have for future projects based on the work you’ve completed? Please list these as short bullet points.

Next step is re-launch our face to face meetings in our process with WLM 2018 results and winners with our awards ceremony and exposition.

Organize our WLM Perú 2019 edition

Part 2: The Grant

Finances

Actual spending

Please copy and paste the completed table from your project finances page. Check that you’ve listed the actual expenditures compared with what was originally planned. If there are differences between the planned and actual use of funds, please use the column provided to explain them.

5 travels for 1600 USD, in our project we planing visit 4 regions but we are in capacity to arrive to 5 regions. In each place we develop meetings and activities for 1 week at least. In print posters and postals invitations (print and shipping) 500 posters and 500 invitations letters x 600

Remaining funds

Do you have any unspent funds from the grant?

Please answer yes or no. If yes, list the amount you did not use and explain why.

No

If you have unspent funds, they must be returned to WMF. Please see the instructions for returning unspent funds and indicate here if this is still in progress, or if this is already completed:

Documentation

Did you send documentation of all expenses paid with grant funds to grantsadminwikimedia.org, according to the guidelines here?

Please answer yes or no. If no, include an explanation.

yes

Confirmation of project status

Did you comply with the requirements specified by WMF in the grant agreement?

Please answer yes or no.

Yes

Is your project completed?

Please answer yes or no.

No

Grantee reflection

We’d love to hear any thoughts you have on what this project has meant to you, or how the experience of being a grantee has gone overall. Is there something that surprised you, or that you particularly enjoyed, or that you’ll do differently going forward as a result of the Project Grant experience? Please share it here!