Grants:Project/Rapid/SarahMirk/Portland Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon 2022/Report
This report has been submitted by the grantee, and is currently being reviewed by WMF staff. Please create a discussion page for this grant report by following this redlink to add comments, responses, or questions, or by using the button below.
- To read the approved grant submission for this project, please visit Grants:Project/Rapid/SarahMirk/Portland Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon 2022.
- Review the reporting requirements to better understand the reporting process.
- Note that if a grantee is unresponsive or uncooperative for 21 days or more, this report will be moved by WMF to incomplete.
- With questions about commenting on a report, or with questions about submitting a report, please Email rapidgrants at wikimedia dot org.
- Review all Rapid Grant reports under review.
Portland Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon 2022
Goals
[edit]Did you meet your goals? Are you happy with how the project went? We hosted an online and in-person edit-a-thon with a total of 17 editors. Many of these editors were new to Wikipedia. I felt good about bringing in and training numerous people who had never edited Wikipedia before. I was also pleasantly surprised to lean that four of the editors were international (two in Canada, one in the UK, one in India). Two editors work for a college, where they are hoping to host an edit-a-thon in the future to improve entries of female artists featured in the college's art collection. Our in-person turnout was 10 editors, which was lower than I was hoping but this was the first in-person Wikipedia event in Portland since the pandemic began and it was a good start to building back the community.
Outcome
[edit]Please report on your original project targets. Please be sure to review and provide metrics required for Rapid Grants.
| Target outcome | Achieved outcome | Explanation |
| 20 editors | 17 editors | We had more people learn to edit online than in-person |
| 15 articles edited | 22 articles edited | |
| 2 articles created | 3 articles created |
Learning
[edit]Projects do not always go according to plan. Sharing what you learned can help you and others plan similar projects in the future. Help the movement learn from your experience by answering the following questions:
- What worked well? The in-person event location was perfect, in terms of the size of the space and accessibility. It has gender-neutral bathrooms, ADA access, and big tables and WIFI to work at. We ate burritos together for lunch outside and altogether it was fun!
- What did not work so well? I was hoping that more students would turn out from local colleges and art schools, but they did not.
- What would you do differently next time? Build better collaborations with local colleges to make sure they get the word out to students and staff about this event.
Finances
[edit]Grant funds spent
[edit]Please describe how much grant money you spent for approved expenses, and tell us what you spent it on. Food - $260 Space rental - $274 Nametags - $5
Remaining funds
[edit]Do you have any remaining grant funds? No
Anything else
[edit]Anything else you want to share about your project?
I'm proud of how many edits we made! Check out the event dashboard to see all of our edits and editors.