Jump to content

Grants:Programs/Wikimedia Community Fund/Rapid Fund/PUC and GIJ Editathon Series (ID: 22061066)

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
statusNot funded
PUC and GIJ Editathon Series
proposed start date2023-03-24
proposed end date2023-08-31
budget (local currency)65880 GHS
budget (USD)4674.63 USD
grant typeIndividual
funding regionSSA
decision fiscal year2022-23
applicant• Elkay20
organization (if applicable)• N/A

This is an automatically generated Meta-Wiki page. The page was copied from Fluxx, the web service of Wikimedia Foundation Funds where the user has submitted their application. Please do not make any changes to this page because all changes will be removed after the next update. Use the discussion page for your feedback. The page was created by CR-FluxxBot.

Applicant Details

[edit]
Please provide your main Wikimedia Username.

Elkay20

Please provide the Usernames of people related to this proposal.

Sunkanmi12

Organization

N/A

Are you a member of any Wikimedia affiliate or group, including informal groups like Wiki Fan Clubs, emerging language communities, not recognized Wikimedia groups etc.? Please list them all.

Global Open Initiative LUCG Wikimedia Community

Grant Proposal

[edit]
M. Please state the title of your proposal. This will also be the Meta-Wiki page title.

PUC and GIJ Editathon Series

Q. Indicate if it is a local, international, or regional proposal and if it involves several countries? (optional)

Local

Q2. If you have answered regional or international, please write the country names and any other information that is useful for understanding your proposal.


R. If you would like, please share any websites or social media accounts that your group or organization has.


1. What is the change that you are trying to bring about and why is this important.

We are proposing a series of events to teach participants how to create and improve Wikipedia and Wikidata articles and items respectively, with an emphasis on underrepresented communities and topics. This is significant because Wikipedia is a widely accessed source of information that impacts people's perception of the world, but existing content is tilted toward topics and communities that are already well-represented. Our activities seek to address the platform's lack of representation and diversity by giving training and assistance to new editors from underrepresented communities, with the goal of improving Wikipedia's and Wikidata's representation and diversity.

2. Describe your main approaches or strategies to achieve these changes and why you think they will be effective.

Our key strategy for implementing these changes is to organize a series of training events that will educate participants with the information and skills required to develop and edit Wikipedia and Wikidata articles. These sessions will be targeted to the needs of underrepresented groups and topics, with experienced Wikipedia editors and Wikidata contributors on hand to provide instruction and assistance.

Among our strategies for implementing these improvements are:

  • Recruiting participants from Pentecost University and Ghana Institute of Journalism and providing training, support, and mentoring.
  • Collaboration with LUCG Wikimedia Community and its leaders to increase awareness of the events and assist in facilitation, mentoring and support
  • Providing participants with a friendly and accepting environment in which they can learn and grow at their own speed.*
  • Providing participants with resources and information, such as templates and guidelines, to assist them in effectively creating and improving articles and items.
  • Following up with attendees after the event to offer support and encourage them to keep editing.

We believe these strategies will be effective because they are focused on best practices for community and capacity building in the context of Wikipedia and Wikidata. Furthermore, we believe that by providing training and assistance specific to the interests of underrepresented groups, we will be able to recruit and maintain a diverse group of editors who will be well-equipped to create and improve articles and items on these platforms. Additionally, the follow-up and mentorship will guarantee that the new editors are supported even after the training session, allowing them to contribute to the platform in the future.

3. What are the activities you will be developing and delivering as part of these approaches or strategies?

We will develop and implement a number of activities as part of our approaches and strategies, including:

  1. Recruitment and outreach: We will collaborate with LUCG Wikimedia Community and its leaders to identify and recruit suitable training participants. This will entail designing and disseminating promotional materials such as flyers, brochures, and social media postings to create awareness of the events and encourage people to sign up.
  2. Training workshops: We will organize and conduct training workshops to equip participants with the information and skills required to create and improve Wikipedia and Wikidata articles. These courses will be targeted to the interests of underrepresented groups and themes, and will cover topics such as accessing Wikipedia and Wikidata, creating and editing articles and items, sourcing and citing information, and using templates and guidelines.
  1. Mentorship and support: Throughout the training process, we will give participants with mentoring and support. This will entail pairing participants with experienced editors who can provide assistance and answer questions, as well as providing participants with resources and materials, such as templates and guidelines, to assist them in efficiently creating and improving articles and items.
  1. Follow-up and community engagement: Following the event, we will contact participants to offer support and urge them to continue editing. This will entail forming a community of participants who can support and learn from one another, as well as organizing extra training and support sessions to assist participants in further strengthening their abilities.
4. Are your activities part of a Wikimedia movement campaign or event? If so, please select the relevant campaign below. If so, please select all the relevant campaigns from the list below. If "other", please state which.

Not applicable

5. Do you have the team that is needed to implement this proposal?

Yes, we have a team that is needed to implement this proposal. The team is composed of the following members:

Elkay20 - Project Lead and Facilitator: Elkay20 will be responsible for providing clear instructions and directions to the team members, defining team members' responsibilities, roles, and functions, developing and carrying out a project plan and execution, encouraging team members and other project stakeholders to contribute and provide feedback, providing a clear and impartial assessment of project movement and nature in terms of production costs and expenses, determining the best time to advance projects and move on to the next stage, conducting continuous evaluation and adjustment within a specific time frame to ensure that both internal and external factors are not harmed, and keeping track of activities and timelines for the execution of specific activities.

Sunkanmi12 - Trainer/ workshop facilitator and Mentor: Sunkanmi12 will be responsible for curating articles for the events, organizing workshops on Wikipedia and Wikidata, and providing support to participants during and after the event.

Nimot 123 - Communications: Nimot 123 will be responsible for assisting in the development of communication techniques, copywriting, editing, proofreading, and formatting, informing the community members of the project's development, and scheduling meetings.

Awahab515 and Itqaan - Welfare and Logistics: They will be in charge of the welfare of the community members. This includes refreshments, swags. They will also be the first point of contact in the case of UCoC or Friendly Space Policy being violations.

Lamalif14 - Support The team members are experienced Wikipedia editors and Wikidata contributors, and are all volunteers. They are members of LUCG Wikimedia community and have usernames on Wikipedia and Wikidata. They are committed to the success of this project and have the necessary skills and experience to carry out their roles effectively

6. Please state if your proposal aims to work to bridge any of the identified CONTENT knowledge gaps (Knowledge Inequity)? Select up to THREE that most apply to your work.

Content Gender gap, Age (regency), Geography, Cultural background, ethnicity, religion, racial

6.1 In a few sentences, explain how your work is specifically addressing this content gap (or Knowledge inequity) to ensure a greater representation of knowledge.

Our project addresses the content gap explicitly by offering training and support for underrepresented groups and topics on Wikipedia and Wikidata. We are recruiting participants from these communities, providing them with resources and materials, and providing them with mentorship and advice from experienced editors. We hope that by making these materials available, we can increase the number and quality of articles and items about underrepresented communities.

7. Please state if your proposal includes any of these areas or THEMATIC focus. Select up to THREE that most apply to your work and explain the rationale for identifying these themes.

Education, Advocacy, Diversity

8. Will your work focus on involving participants from any underrepresented communities?

Gender Identity, Geographic , Ethnic/racial/religious or cultural background, Linguistic / Language, Age

9. Who are the target participants and from which community? How will you engage participants before and during the activities? How will you follow up with participants after the activities?

Our intended participants are Pentecost University and Ghana Institute of Journalism students. The purpose is to engage and train these students to write and enhance articles and products on underrepresented communities, such as the Ghanaians and other communities in Ghana.

To engage the participants before and during the activities, we will use a variety of methods:

  • We will work with the universities to identify students who are interested in participating in the training events.
  • We will use social media, such as Facebook and WhatsApp, to create a group where we can share information about the events and answer any questions that the students may have.
  • We will use email and phone to contact the students to remind them of the events and to provide them with any necessary information.
  • During the activities, we will provide a friendly and supportive environment where the students can feel comfortable asking questions and sharing their thoughts.

We will use a variety of strategies to follow up with participants following the activities:

  • We will distribute a survey to participants in order to collect feedback on the events and suggest areas for improvement.
  • We will establish a community in which members can continue to support and learn from one another.
  • We will provide further training and support sessions to participants so that they can continue to improve their skills.
  • We will encourage participants to continue editing Wikipedia and Wikidata by giving resources such as templates and guidelines, as well as mentorship.
10. In what ways are you actively seeking to contribute towards creating a safer, supportive, more equitable environment for participants?

We will ensure that we include a "friendly space" policy in our form for participants who intend to participate in our activities. All forms of harassment will not be tolerated.

11. Please tell us about how you have let your Wikimedia communities know about the planned activities and this proposal. Use this space to describe the processes you carried out to make the community more involved in planning this proposal. Please link the on-wiki community discussion(s) around the proposals.

LUCG Wikimedia Community leaders are aware of this project and we have inculcated their ideas into this proposal. We also involved the concerned institutions about the event.

12. Are you aware of other Rapid Fund proposals in your local group, community, or region that are being submitted and that align with your proposed project?

Yes

If yes:

12.1 Did you explore the possibility of doing a joint proposal with other leaders in your group?
No
12.2 How will this joint proposal allow you to have better results?
LUCG Wikimedia Community has been handling projects of this nature. The team has been doing a fantastic job in helping students hone their language, research, fact-checking and writing skills. Working with them on this project whilst they share their expertise will help this project succeed.
13. Will you be working with other external, non-Wikimedia partners to implement this proposal? Required.

No

13.1 Please describe these partnerships and what motivates the potential partner to be part of the proposal and how they add value to your work.


14. In what ways do you think your proposal most contributes to the Movement Strategy 2030 recommendations. Select a maximum of THREE options that most apply.

Increase the Sustainability of Our Movement, Improve User Experience, Identify Topics for Impact

Learning, Sharing, and Evaluation

[edit]
15. What do you hope to learn from your work in this fund proposal?

If we were successful in bringing about the desired change, we aim to learn the following from our efforts: How many articles and items have the participants created or improved? How many of these articles and items are about underrepresented groups? How many people continued to edit Wikipedia and Wikidata following the training sessions? What were the most difficult issues that participants faced when creating and improving articles and items on Wikipedia and Wikidata? What are the primary accomplishments of participants in creating and improving articles and items on Wikipedia and Wikidata? What effect has the training session had on the participants' confidence in editing Wikipedia and Wikidata? What were the critical parameters that contributed to the training events' success or failure? How effective were the team and facilitators at creating a safe and friendly environment for the participants?

16. Based on these learning questions, what is the information or data you need to collect to answer these questions? Please register this information (as metric description) in the following spaces provided.
Main Open Metrics Data
Main Open Metrics Description Target
Number of Events We will host 5 events each at both institutions. 10
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
17. Core quantitative metrics.
Core Metrics Summary
Core metrics Description Target
Number of participants 200
Number of editors 200
Number of organizers We will also be supported by the Student Representative Council and Administration of each institution 6
Number of new content contributions per Wikimedia project
Wikimedia Project Description Target
Wikipedia N/A 500
Wikidata N/A 500
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
17.1 If for some reason your proposal will not measure these core metrics please provide an explanation.


18. What tools would you use to measure each metric selected? Please refer to the guide for a list of tools. You can also write that you are not sure and need support.

Google Form Program and Event Dashboard

Financial Proposal

[edit]
19. & 19.1 What is the amount you are requesting from Wikimedia Foundation? Please provide this amount in your local currency.

65880 GHS

19.2 What is this amount in US Currency (to the best of your knowledge)?

4674.63 USD

20. Please upload your budget for this proposal or indicate the link to it.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GTeGhrnY5EgZBqfpd55shH6LEzhQWP73bczm_EVv7PE/edit#gid=0

We/I have read the Application Privacy Statement, WMF Friendly Space Policy and Universal Code of Conduct.

Yes

Endorsements and Feedback

[edit]

Please add endorsements and feedback to the grant discussion page only. Endorsements added here will be removed automatically.

Community members are invited to share meaningful feedback on the proposal and include reasons why they endorse the proposal. Consider the following:

  • Stating why the proposal is important for the communities involved and why they think the strategies chosen will achieve the results that are expected.
  • Highlighting any aspects they think are particularly well developed: for instance, the strategies and activities proposed, the levels of community engagement, outreach to underrepresented groups, addressing knowledge gaps, partnerships, the overall budget and learning and evaluation section of the proposal, etc.
  • Highlighting if the proposal focuses on any interesting research, learning or innovation, etc. Also if it builds on learning from past proposals developed by the individual or organization, or other Wikimedia communities.
  • Analyzing if the proposal is going to contribute in any way to important developments around specific Wikimedia projects or Movement Strategy.
  • Analysing if the proposal is coherent in terms of the objectives, strategies, budget, and expected results (metrics).

Endorse

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grants:Programs/Wikimedia_Community_Fund/Rapid_Fund/PUC_and_GIJ_Editathon_Series_(ID:_22061066)&oldid=25103069"