Grants:PEG/Program resources/Edit-a-thons/Sample Report
|
This is a sample report. While it is based on real examples, some details have been changed. |
statusReport under review
Women in Science Edit-a-thon Series
Design a series of edit-a-thons to improve content about women in STEM and to encourage female editors.
targetEnglish Wikipedia
strategic priorityquality
start dateOctober 1, 2014
start yearplease add a start year
end dateDecember 30, 2014
end yearplease add a end year
budget (USD)620 USD
grant typeindividual
Project status
[edit]- Did you comply with the requirements specified by WMF in the grant agreement?
- PLACEHOLDER TEXT
- Is your project completed?
- PLACEHOLDER TEXT
Activities and lessons learned
[edit]Activities
[edit]- PLACEHOLDER TEXT
Lessons learned
[edit]- What worked well?
- PLACEHOLDER TEXT
- What didn't work?
- PLACEHOLDER TEXT
- What would you do differently if you planned a similar project?
- PLACEHOLDER TEXT
Learning patterns
[edit]Outcomes and impact
[edit]Outcomes
[edit]- Provide the original project goal here.
- PLACEHOLDER TEXT
- Did you achieve your project goal? How do you know your goal was achieved? Please answer in 1 - 2 short paragraphs.
- PLACEHOLDER TEXT
Progress towards targets and goals
[edit]| Metric | Achieved outcome | Explanation |
| 1. # number of active editors touched | ||
| 2. # of new editors | ||
| 3. # of individuals touched | ||
| 4. # of new images/media added to Wikimedia articles/pages | ||
| 5. # of articles added or improved on Wikimedia projects | ||
| 6. Absolute value of bytes added to or deleted from Wikimedia projects |
Project metrics
| Project metrics | Target outcome | Achieved outcome | Explanation |
Impact
[edit]What impact did this project have on WMF's mission and the strategic priorities?
Option A: How did you increase participation in one or more Wikimedia projects?
Option B: How did you improve quality on one or more Wikimedia projects?
Option C: How did you increase the reach (readership) of one or more Wikimedia projects?
Reporting and documentation of expenditures
[edit]This section describes the grant's use of funds
Documentation
[edit]- Did you send documentation of all expenses paid with grant funds to grants at wikimedia dot org, according to the guidelines here? Answer "Yes" or "No".
- PLACEHOLDER TEXT
Expenses
[edit]- Please list all project expenses in a table here, with descriptions and dates. Review the instructions here.
PLACEHOLDER TEXT. SEE INSTRUCTIONS AT Grants:Index/Create financial report.
- Total project budget (from your approved grant submission)
- PLACEHOLDER TEXT
- Total amount requested from WMF (from your approved grant submission, this total will be the same as the total project budget if PEG is your only funding source)
- PLACEHOLDER TEXT
- Total amount spent on this project
- PLACEHOLDER TEXT
- Total amount of Project and Event grant funds spent on this project
- PLACEHOLDER TEXT
- Are there additional sources that funded any part of this project? List them here.
- PLACEHOLDER TEXT
Remaining funds
[edit]- Are there any grant funds remaining?
- Answer YES or NO.
- PLACEHOLDER TEXT
- Please list the total amount (specify currency) remaining here. (This is the amount you did not use, or the amount you still have after completing your grant.)
- PLACEHOLDER TEXT
- If funds are remaining they must be returned to WMF, reallocated to mission-aligned activities, or applied to another approved grant.
- Please state here if you intend to return unused funds to WMF, submit a request for reallocation, or submit a new grant request, and then follow the instructions on your approved grant submission.
- PLACEHOLDER TEXT