Global Resource Distribution Committee/Creation of the interim GRDC/Candidates/GhoziSeptiandri
![]() | To leave feedback about this candidate, please use the talk page. |
Ghozi Septiandri (GhoziSeptiandri)
[edit]Preferred name | Ghozi Septiandri | |
---|---|---|
Language capabilities (native or professional / advanced / basic) | My languages capabilities
| |
Region and country you identify with | I identify myself from
| |
Interim GRDC seats you are running for and why (regional volunteer/thematic volunteer) | I'm running the GDRC representative for the ESEAP region. Over the past 2–3 years, the people I've worked with have truly inspired me—affiliates like Wikimedia Australia and Wikimedia Community User Group Malaysia; local communities in Indonesia such as Komunitas Wikidata Indonesia and Komunitas Wikimedia Denpasar; and the RFC for ESEAP. Their dedication to the movement motivates me to contribute even more. I'm also grateful for the opportunity to learn from WMF staff who support these groups in their programs and/or conferences, including Wikimania 2023. I would be honored to connect with more people globally as an ESEAP representative and contribute my WikiExperience to the Interim GDRC over the next two years. | |
Do you have any topic or area of specialization within the Wikimedia movement? (max 1000 characters) | Yes, these are the top three areas I specialize in within the Wikimedia Movement.
| |
Have you ever held any role or position, either current or past, in the Wikimedia movement? (max 1000 characters) | Yes, these are the top five roles that I'm proud to be a part of.
| |
Why are you interested in the interim GRDC and what can you contribute? (max 1000 characters) | I have learned from everyone I’ve collaborated with here in ESEAP Region, witnessing their dedication, sacrifices, and hope for the movement. While my work so far has been limited and hasn’t covered all ESEAP Affiliates and Communities, I see the GDRC as an opportunity to share the spirit and passion I’ve experienced with even more people across ESEAP and Globally. With 2–3 years of experience in the Regional Funds Committees for ESEAP Region, I learn about community engagement, resource allocation, and collaborative decision-making. I am happy to apply these skills to the interim GDRC and take the next step in my journey within the movement. | |
Please share any volunteering or professional experience relevant for the interim GRDC (role, organization, years) (max 1000 characters) | Volunteer experiences outside Wikimedia Movement:
Professionally:
| |
Describe your skills and experience relevant to the interim GRDC (max 1500 characters) | Here is a breakdown of my skills and experience relevant to the interim GDRC:
| |
Describe your understanding of the Wikimedia Movement's current resource distribution process. (max 1500 characters) | My understanding of the Wikimedia Movement's current resource distribution process.
| |
How do you think the GRDC could improve the current situation and which priorities do you think it should have? (max 1500 characters) | The GRDC could improve the current situation by ensuring maximum transparency in its operations, clearly communicating what it represents, and providing information based on reliable data and sources. This approach would benefit not only the regions it serves but also foster better decision-making across the board. In terms of priorities, the focus should be on enhancing communication and understanding among regions. Members should actively represent their regions, ensuring that everyone is on the same page and minimizing any miscommunication. It’s essential to maintain transparency in all processes, allowing for collaborative decision-making that guarantees fairness. By working together, GRDC can ensure that resources and grants are distributed equitably, addressing the needs of every region appropriately. | |
By the end of the pilot in two years, what should the GRDC have accomplished and how should we measure its success? (max 1500 characters) | GDRC should accomplished the following objectives below.
We can measure all of them by community feedback, both grantees and beneficiaries. |