Cross-wiki arbitration committee (2007 proposal)/Requests
 | This page is kept for historical interest. Any policies mentioned may be obsolete. If you want to revive the topic, you can use the talk page or start a discussion on the community forum. |
This is a proposed process to resolve disputes such as the Yiddish Wikipedia case. It is not currently active.
Instructions
[edit]Instructions
[edit]Before requesting, ensure that all the following statements are true.
- There is no arbitration committee on the affected projects.
- You have attempted all applicable steps of the dispute resolution process. In particular, you should attempt discussion, disengagement, and inviting neutral third parties.
- All involved users agree to arbitration.
If the above statements are true:
- Read the instructions in the text below and fill in the required information. Do not remove the instructions or change the format.
- Add your request to the table on the main page.
- Notify all users involved in the dispute about the request for arbitration. They must agree to arbitration on the request page after reading the information on this page.
Current requests
[edit]none.
SPANISH PLN ARTICLE
[edit]Summary of dispute
[edit]Describe the case below very briefly (in no more than 300 words). This should be a fair summary of the case, presenting no arguments and making no judgments as to the validity of any user's positions.
edit here. I currently work in Costa Rica's Political Parties issues in Spanish and have writen most of the artciles, working in neutral and objetvie points of view. I notice that a person constanly changes the article of Partido Liberacion Nacional http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partido_Liberaci%C3%B3n_Nacional stablishing a glorified vertion of the party and whit not objetivness. Even more, it insult other political parties. Please, help me resolve this.
Attempts at resolution
[edit]Briefly list previous attempts to reach agreement through the dispute resolution process.
I use all the tips for alternative resolution of conflicts, even talk to the person, but it`s impossible.
edit here.
Agreement to arbitrate
[edit]All users must agree that any decision taken by the arbitration committee is binding and final. Although the committee may modify a decision if new evidence is provided, it has no obligation to do so. If you agree to abide by said decision, sign your name below by typing "* ~~~". I agree, me e-mail is spockdg@yahoo.com thanks.
Decision
[edit]Rejected. There is no agreement to arbitrate and no evidence the any of the dispute resolution steps have been followed (both the article and the IP talk pages don't exist). Furthermore, there is an Arbitration committee on the Spanish Wikipedia. Besides, the arbitration committee on Meta is a proposal (read the top of the page, beside the alert icon). —{admin} Pathoschild 02:54:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)