Jump to content

Community Wishlist/Focus areas/Repetitive tasks/en

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Help content reviewers more efficiently manage their repetitive tasks Submitted

Description

Help content reviewers more efficiently manage their repetitive tasks, so they can focus more on editing articles or other on-wiki activities.

We'll know we're successful if we can cut down on the number of edits in review and improve moderator satisfaction.

Background

Wiki editors and patrollers perform many repetitive tasks, such adding "citation needed" to a claim, requesting a speedy deletion, or even generating content. While there are a number of bots, gadgets, and extensions to improve repetitive tasks, users who frequently review the edits of others must often manually type in data or write in templates to maintain and groom their local wiki. We think there are additional opportunities to automate or improve the user experience for repetitive tasks to improve moderator satisfaction and efficiency.

Objectives

This focus area connects to the following Wikimedia Foundation objectives:

  • WE1: Both experienced and new contributors rally together online to build a trustworthy encyclopedia, with more ease and less frustration.
  • WE2: Communities are supported to effectively close knowledge gaps through tools and support systems that are easier to access, adapt, and improve, ensuring increased growth in trustworthy encyclopedic content.

Target audience

  • Patrollers and advanced editors. Users who review the work of others to maintain the quality of content on their respective wikis. These users frequently insert templates such as citation needed, speedy deletion, etc.

Other details

Last updated: 19:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Created: 14:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Wishes in this focus area

Below is a list of wishes that have informed this focus area. More wishes may be added to this table over time. Voting for the focus area is not a guarantee that each wish will be explicitly delivered; rather, the wishes are suggestive of the problem at large. Once a focus area is adopted, the respective team will work alongside communities to prioritize and deliver on the most impactful solutions.

Wish Phabricator tasks Type Projects Date (UTC) Status
Paragraph-level cherry-picking for diffs T326162 Feature request Wikipedia 2024-09-21T00:04:27.000ZSeptember 21, 2024 Open
Link "diff" and "hist" for category changes on Watchlist/RecentChanges T148533 Bug report All projects 2024-08-22T15:32:54.000ZAugust 22, 2024 Open
Make the pending changes interface better T369391, T370423 System change Wikipedia 2024-08-09T16:29:35.000ZAugust 9, 2024 Open
Mark page created on the already deleted title T22892 Feature request Wikipedia 2024-08-08T18:13:19.000ZAugust 8, 2024 Open
Mass Admin Actions Feature request All projects 2024-08-06T18:56:59.000ZAugust 6, 2024 Open
Stewardship needed for Adiutor MediaWiki extension T355150, T355153 Feature request Wikipedia 2024-08-06T14:31:53.000ZAugust 6, 2024 Open

Teams and affiliates

Community members

This focus area was informed by submissions from: Closed Limelike Curves, Ebrahim, WikiBayer, Doğu, CanonNi

Voting

This area currently has 22 supporters. Voting for this area is open until it is completed. Show your support using the button below.

Support focus areaPlease log in to support this focus area

Supporters of this area

Support Support Sohom Datta (talk) 08:32, 8 August 2024 (UTC) I think these sets of wishes are well articulated and solving them would benefit both editors on smaller local projects as well as the SWMT[reply]
Support Support Matěj Suchánek (talk) 15:59, 8 August 2024 (UTC) Automation, automation, automation![reply]
Support Support Mrfoogles (talk) 04:37, 17 August 2024 (UTC) Some way to make applying Citation needed easier would be helpful[reply]
Yes but none of the wishes included here seems to be about that. Which is it? There is such adding "citation needed" to a claim in the background info which I find misleading since no wish is about that. The focus area title (it sounds important&useful) is also somewhat misleading since checking watchlists is also a repetitive task but issues about improving that not included. --Prototyperspective (talk) 14:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Support Aaron Liu (talk) 04:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC) I really love Adiutor![reply]
Support Support Hakimi97 (talk) 03:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC) Especially Adiutor. Although Twinkle contains more maintenance tags but it is too outdated in terms of interface.[reply]
Support Support Alachuckthebuck (talk) 16:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC) Please, we need all the tools we can get, especially at commons[reply]
Support Support MER-C (talk) 10:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC) I would also like to see mass admin action tools applied to arbitrary lists of users/pages.[reply]