24% of program leaders who participated in this survey reported that they think of themselves as females while 75% reported that they think of themselves as males.
From the program leaders who participated in this qestion, 90% reported participating in local meetups, 17% in reginal hackathons, 60% in regional conferences, 15% in international hackathons and 65% in international conferences.
35% of program leaders who participated in this question reported having ever felt unsafe in any Wikimedia online or offline space, including being harassed, bullied, attacked, etc.
3 – Participate in online Wikimedia events (e.g. a remote conference or meet-up) (53%)
4 – Support Mediawiki or Wikimedia software development (e.g. report a bug, test a product, have technical discussions, write software code, build tools) (32%)
5 – Organize community programs or events (e.g. editathons, GLAM, conferences, education program) (77%)
6 – Participate in a Wikimedia affiliate (e.g. Wikimedia chapter, thematic organization, user group) (80%)
7 – Conduct research related to Wikimedia (e.g. worked on a project on meta:research) (20%)
8 – Apply for any Wikimedia Foundation grant (e.g. Annual Plan Grants, Project and Event Grants, Rapid Grants, Project grants, Travel and Participation Support Grant) (51%)
Which of the following annual Wikimedia events that were supported by the Wikimedia Foundation have you attended in the last 3 years? (select all that apply)
93% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that they have collaborated or engaged with any staff from the Wikimedia Foundation in the last 12 months, in any way (online, in-person, etc.).
79% of program leaders who participated in this question reported they are mostly or completely familiar with the organizations associated with Wikimedia or Wikipedia.
49% of program leaders who participated in this question were mostly or completely familiar with the Wikimedia Foundation program called "Wikipedia Zero".
The Wikimedia Foundation partnered with mobile service providers to test a new project. This project allows mobile phones without internet capability to receive Wikipedia content via text messages.
This expands the reach of Wikipedia content to people who do not have smartphones or cannot afford mobile data charges. In some of these partnerships, users would be required to pay a text message charge (standard SMS fee or subsidized in some cases) per response.
To what extent do you support or oppose this kind of partnership?
The Wikimedia Foundation is interested in more partnerships with companies in the private sector. To become a partner, companies must share the Foundation's values, mission, and ethics. Companies must also have strong corporate social responsibility efforts supporting education.
These companies often provide services to underserved segments of the population where they operate. For example, the companies build schools, provide connectivity or devices, or promote certain content. The Foundation could work with new partners to create new programs that aim to increase the reach of Wikimedia projects.
To what extent do you support or oppose this kind of partnership?
3 – I neither support nor oppose these partnerships (12%)
4 – I somewhat support these partnerships (37%)
5 – I strongly support these partnerships (43%)
80% of program leaders who participated in this question somewhat support or strongly support the Wikimedia Foundation partnering with companies in the private sector
The Wikimedia Foundation is interested in more partnerships with public or governmental institutions. These include Ministries of Education and Information and Communications Technology (ICT), and others. To become a partner, public sector institutions must share our values, mission, and ethics.
Public and governmental institutions often play a major role in shaping a country's education. For example, they can promote technology adoption to underserved segments of the population. The Foundation could work with these partners to include Wikimedia projects in ongoing public sector efforts. This will help the movement increase the reach and awareness of Wikimedia projects. Often, government partnerships can reach a larger number of people than other kinds of partnerships.
To what extent do you support or oppose this kind of partnership?
3 – I neither support nor oppose these partnerships (4%)
4 – I somewhat support these partnerships (27%)
5 – I strongly support these partnerships (66%)
93% of program leaders who participated in this question somewhat support or strongly support the Wikimedia Foundation partnering with public or governmental institutions.
The Wikimedia Foundation is interested in partnerships with local or regional non-profit organizations. To become a partner,non-profit organizations must have a similar mission as the Wikimedia movement. They must also share the Foundation's values, mission, and ethics.
Local non-for-profit organizations have practical knowledge and expertise in their geography and topic areas. The Foundation could work with these partners to create new programs and expand the reach of Wikimedia projects. With their expertise, non-profit organizations can help the Foundation reach its goals more efficiently.
Do you support or oppose this kind of partnership?
3 – I neither support nor oppose these partnerships (5%)
4 – I somewhat support these partnerships (25%)
5 – I strongly support these partnerships (65%)
90% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that they support or strongly support the Foundation partnering with local or regional non-profit organizations.
The Wikimedia Foundation is interested in partnering with a broader category of educational institutions (schools, universities, academies, think tanks, etc). These partnerships may allow us to find opportunities to bring new readers to Wikipedia, especially students who have never heard of it.
Educational institutions are able to distribute the freely available content on the Wikimedia projects. They can distribute content in their classrooms and communities. These partnerships could help strengthen the ongoing Wikipedia Education Programs (WEPs) around the world. We would work hand-in-hand with WEPs in these partnership.
Do you support or oppose this kind of partnership?
3 – I neither support nor oppose these partnerships (1%)
4 – I somewhat support these partnerships (18%)
5 – I strongly support these partnerships (76%)
94% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that they support or strongly support the Foundation partnering with a broader category of educational institutions
21% of program leaders who participated in this question reported often or almost always using Mediawiki Wiki to learn new information that affects your program(s) or Wikimedia affiliate(s).
How often do you typically learn new information that affects your program(s) or Wikimedia affiliate(s) through the following channels?-Other Wikimedia mailing lists
46% of program leaders who participated in this question reported often or almost always using other Wikimedia mailing lists to learn new information that affects their program(s) or Wikimedia affiliate(s).
How often do you typically learn new information that affects your program(s) or Wikimedia affiliate(s) through the following channels?-Affiliates only mailing list
34% of program leaders who participated in this question reported often or almost always using affiliates-only mailing lists to learn new information that affects their program(s) or Wikimedia affiliate(s).
30% of program leaders who participated in this question reported often or almost always use the Wikimedia Blog to learn new information that affects their program(s) or Wikimedia affiliate(s).
How often do you typically learn new information that affects your program(s) or Wikimedia affiliate(s) through the following channels?-Social Media (Facebook, Twitter)
51% of program leaders who participated in this question reported often or almost always using social media to learn new information that affects their program(s) or Wikimedia affiliate(s).
How often do you typically learn new information that affects your program(s) or Wikimedia affiliate(s) through the following channels?-Other (please explain)
48% of program leaders who participated in this question reported often or almost always use other methods to learn new information that affects their program(s) or Wikimedia affiliate(s).
Overall, to what extent are you satisfied or dissatisfied with all the existing communication channels (blog, social media, mailing lists) related to your programs/affiliate?
68% of program leaders who participated in this question reported being satisfied or very satisfied with all the existing communication channels (blog, social media, mailing lists) related to your programs/affiliate.
22% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that program toolkits were mostly and completely useful in evaluating their programs.
56% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that help from foundation staff was mostly or completely useful in evaluating their programs.
20% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that the Survey Support Desk was mostly or completely useful in evaluating their programs.
40% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that they share learning on social media, mailing lists more than half the time or almost always.
How many times do you share your knowledge about the programs you implement in the following ways?-Share your experience at a conference or wiki meet-up.
50% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that they share your experience at a conference or wiki meet-up more than half the time or almost always.
36% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that they share knowledge about the programs they implement by mentoring less experienced program leaders.
21% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that they write blogs about their program outcomes more than half the time or almost always.
How many times do you create learning content about the programs you have implemented in the following ways?-Write guides or case studies for others to replicate your program
15% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that they write guides or case studies for others to replicate your program more than half the time or almost always.
11% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that they write or contribute to Learning Patterns more than half the time or almost always.
How many times do you create learning content about the programs you have implemented in the following ways?-Create data visualizations or other graphics
12% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that they create data visualizations or other graphics more than half the time or almost always.
13% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that they sometimes or often use the ABCD framework for reports blogs or presentations.
1 – Wikimedia chapter or thematic organization (56%)
2 – Wikimedia user group (46%)
3 – I am not part of any affiliate (9%)
From the program leaders who participated in this question, 56% reported that they are part of a Wikimedia user group, 46% reported that they are part of a Wikimedia chapter, and 9% are not part of any Wikimedia Affiliate. We define being "part of" a Wikimedia affiliates as a member, volunteer or staff.
1 – Wikimedia chapter or thematic organization (52%)
2 – Wikimedia user group (48%)
From the program leaders who participated in this question and who selected that they are part of a user group and chapter, 52% or program leaders reported that their primary affiliate is a user group while 48% reported that their primary affiliate is a chapter.
55% of program leaders who participated in this survey reported that their role in their primary affiliate is that they are organizational leadership/coordinators, 8% as staff, 15% as volunteer, 14% as member, and 9% as something else.
Which of the following Wikimedia programs or projects, if any, have you personally helped to implement (e.g. planning, organizing, running) in the last 12 months. Select all that apply.
From the programs that they helped implement over the last 12 months, the three programs that program leaders reported implementing the most are editathons, editing workshops, and conferences.
From the program leaders who participated in this survey question, 3 to 4 years is the median number of years that program leaders reported having experience with organizing editathons.
From the program leaders who participated in this survey question, three to four years is the median number of years that program leaders reported having experience with organizing Editing Workshops.
From the program leaders who participated in this survey question, three to four years is the median number of years that program leaders reported having experience with organizing Conferences.
From the program leaders who participated in this survey question, three to four years is the median number of years that program leaders reported having experience with organizing Wikipedia Education Programs.
From the program leaders who participated in this survey question, three to four years is the median number of years that program leaders reported having experience with organizing GLAM content donations.
From the program leaders who participated in this survey question, three to four years is the median number of years that program leaders reported having experience with organizing Wiki Loves Monuments.
From the program leaders who participated in this survey question, three to four years is the median number of years that program leaders reported having experience with organizing On-wiki-Writing Contests.
From the program leaders who participated in this survey question, three to four years is the median number of years that program leaders reported having experience with organizing other photo events.
From the program leaders who participated in this survey question, one to four years is the median number of years that program leaders reported having experience with organizing Wikimedian in Residence.
From the program leaders who participated in this survey question, one to two years is the median number of years that program leaders reported having experience with organizing hackathons.
From the program leaders who participated in this survey question, one to two years is the median number of years that program leaders reported having experience with organizing other programs.
From the program leaders who participated in this survey question, one to two years is the median number of years that program leaders reported having experience with organizing Wiki Loves Earth.
From the program leaders who participated in this survey question, three to four years is the median number of years that program leaders reported having experience with organizing Research Projects.
From the program leaders who participated in this survey question, one to four years is the median number of years that program leaders reported having experience with organizing Wikiexpeditions.
From the program leaders who participated in this survey question, three to four years is the median number of years that program leaders reported having experience with organizing WikiTakes.
53% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that they feel mostly or completely prepared to articulate their program strategy and goals.
64% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that they feel mostly or completely prepared to document their program activities and event(s).
How prepared are you to implement program evaluation? Please rate each of the following:-Tracking and monitoring accomplishments directly associated with your program event(s)
58% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that they feel mostly or completely prepared to track and monitor accomplishments directly associated with their program event(s)
49% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that they feel mostly or completely prepared to track and monitor accomplishments directly associated with their program event(s)
63% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that they feel mostly or completely prepared for reporting and storytelling about their program
54% of program leaders who participated in this questions reported that their level of experience with Wikimetrics to measure the outputs/outcomes of their programs is intermediate, advanced or expert.
73% of program leaders who participated in this questions reported that their level of experience with Surveys to measure the outputs/outcomes of their programs is intermediate, advanced or expert.
66% of program leaders who participated in this questions reported that their level of experience with GLAM tools to measure the outputs/outcomes of their programs is intermediate, advanced or expert.
41% of program leaders who participated in this questions reported that their level of experience with Quarry to measure the outputs/outcomes of their programs is intermediate, advanced or expert.
Overall, what how much experience do you have with each of the following tools to measure the outputs/outcomes of your programs?-Program and Events Dashboard
54% of program leaders who participated in this questions reported that their level of experience with Program and Events Dashboard to measure the outputs/outcomes of their programs is intermediate, advanced or expert.
Overall, what how much experience do you have with each of the following tools to measure the outputs/outcomes of your programs?-Grants metrics "magic button"
51% of program leaders who participated in this questions reported that their level of experience with Grants metrics "magic button" to measure the outputs/outcomes of their programs is intermediate, advanced or expert.
25% of program leaders who participated in this question reported that the Grants metrics "magic button" Program and Events Dashboard is difficult or very difficult to use.
If a other mission aligned organization (e.g. Library, University, etc.) approached you today about getting involved with Wikimedia, which of the following would you feel confident explaining: (select all that apply)
