97% of sampled editors who responded to this question reported that when reading wikipedia it is fairly, quite or very important how the page looks on desktop.
83% of sampled editors who responded to this question reported that when reading wikipedia it is fairly, quite or very important how the page looks on mobile phones.
80% of sampled editors who responded to this question reported that when reading wikipedia it is fairly, quite or very important how the page looks on tablets. 15% of participants who answered the question selected "no opinion.
71% of sampled editors who responded to this question reported that when reading wikipedia it is fairly, quite or very important how the page looks on apps. 22% of participants who answered the question selected "no opinion.
87% of sampled editors who responded to this question reported that when reading wikipedia it is fairly, quite, or very important how the page looks on apps.
89% of sampled editors who responded to this question reported that when reading wikipedia it is fairly, quite, or very important how the page appears in search engine results.
78% of sampled editors who responded to this question reported that when reading wikipedia it is fairly, quite, or very important how the infobox looks on mobile phones. 18% of participants who answered the survey selected "No opinion".
79% of sampled editors who responded to this question reported that when reading wikipedia it is fairly, quite or very important how tables look on mobile phones. 15% of participants who answered the question selected "no opinion"
66% of sampled editors who responded to this question reported that when reading wikipedia it is quite important or very important whether the content is open-licensed.
From your perspective, how important are each of the following when reading Wikimedia projects? - Whether the embedded media does not use proprietary platforms
57% of sampled editors who responded to this question reported that when reading wikipedia it is quite important or very important whether the embedded media does not use proprietary platforms.
From your perspective, how important are each of the following when reading Wikimedia projects? - Whether the content always uses freely-licensed images
60% of sampled editors who responded to this question reported that when reading wikipedia it is quite important or very important whether the content always uses freely-licensed images.
72% of sampled very active editors who participated in the survey feel that the Wikimedia Foundation is mostly or completely meeting the technical needs of reviewing recent changes.
68% of sampled very active editors who participated in the survey feel that the Wikimedia Foundation is mostly or completely meeting the technical needs of reviewing new articles.
Do you feel the Wikimedia Foundation is meeting the technical needs of Wikimedia contributors in the following areas? - Identifying and surfacing content problems
42% of sampled very active editors who participated in the survey feel that the Wikimedia Foundation is mostly or completely meeting the technical needs of identifying and surfacing content problems.
52% of sampled very active editors who participated in the survey feel that the Wikimedia Foundation is mostly or completely meeting the technical needs of managing media.
45% of sampled very active editors who participated in the survey feel that the Wikimedia Foundation is mostly or completely meeting the technical needs of working with templates.
52% of sampled very active editors who participated in the survey feel that the Wikimedia Foundation is mostly or completely meeting the technical needs of categorizing content
47% of sampled very active editors who participated in the survey feel that the Wikimedia Foundation is mostly or completely meeting the technical needs of supporting gadgets.
43% of sampled very active editors who participated in the survey feel that the Wikimedia Foundation is mostly or completely meeting the technical needs of bots and third party tools.
2 – Help test new Wikimedia Foundation products (32%)
3 – Help document Wikimedia Foundation software products (15%)
4 – Submit bugs related to Wikimedia Foundation products through phabricator (44%)
5 – Use Wikimedia projects and products (72%)
6 – Other (specify): (12%)
From survey participants who have participated in developing software, 44% reported submitting bugs, 32% reported testing software, and 72% reported being users of Wikimedia projects.
48% of sampled editors who responded to this question reported that when they translate they find it easy or very easy to find the availability of new translations. 19% of those who answered the question selected "no opinion".
51% of sampled editors who responded to this question reported that when they translate they find it easy or very easy to find translations to update. 18% of those who answered the question selected "no opinion".
50% of sampled editors who responded to this question reported that when they translate they find it easy or very easy to find progression status for a translation. 21% of those who answered the question selected "no opinion".
31% of sampled editors who responded to this question reported that when they translate they find it easy or very easy to find the priority of different translations. 24% of those who answered the question selected "no opinion".
4 – Wikimedia Foundation product newsletters (Visual editor/Discovery weekly) (8%)
5 – Community pages/Village pump on wikimedia project (43%)
6 – Wikimedia Blog (11%)
7 – Tech blogs and websites outside of Wikimedia Foundation (18%)
8 – Social networks (16%)
9 – Other (4%)
10 – I don’t receive these updates (30%)
11 – Wikitech mailing list (7%)
12 – Phabricator (8%)
43% of participants selected receiving updates about WMF software on community pages/village pumps, and 30% selected that they do not receive these updates.
