Abstract Wikipedia/Wikifunctions logo concept/Proposal 4

Derived from the Wikimedia Logo and kept consistent to the brand guidelines
Starting from the lambda symbol, the mathematical references include the original blue circle cut to resemble two parentheses, and the red circle is a nod to w:Dot_(diacritic)#Overdot
Could be represented directly with Unicode combination characters (λ)
It was observed in the comments a potential similarity with this logo c:File:Half-Life Lambda popr..png, although it was unknown to the author

Voting

Voting has closed.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Support Shizhao (talk) 01:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support LeoAShima (talk) 02:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amadalvarez (talk) 06:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Der Fussi 06:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Betseg (talk) 07:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it, but I fear that the lambda reference will be lost. .mau. ✉ 08:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Susann Schweden (talk) 09:34, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Professional looking. Spacy. Clear. The dot could perhaps be larger. Zanaq (talk) 09:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice logo! Ferdi2005 _[Mail] 10:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wim b 10:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mmo (talk) 10:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lepticed7 (talk) 11:39, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mcoffsky (talk) 13:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support very well rounded and fitting new style of Wikimedia Zblace (talk) 17:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk) 20:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 21:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support EricaAzzellini (talk) 21:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yger (talk) 06:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Emha (talk) 09:55, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Syrcro (talk) 10:45, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alex Tanchoco (talk) 15:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is neat! Like the simplicity, and this one looks less like Half-Life than the other similar one. Neat ActuallyNeverHappened02 (talk) 15:30, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geraki ^T_L 19:30, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vaticidalprophet (talk) 08:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eavq (talk) 11:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jcornelius (talk) 14:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple, nice, and compatible with logos for other projects. SecretName101 (talk) 19:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superpes15 (talk) 00:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bencemac (talk) 08:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tubezlob (talk) 17:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 05:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Morneo06 (talk) 20:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ZioNicco (talk) 13:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amarvudol (talk) 10:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Masur (talk) 10:47, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Artrixs (talk) 11:07, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks really cool MEisSCAMMER (talk) 22:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 06:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support My favourite Wikifunctions logo concept! Vulp here 08:44, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support KasciJ (talk) 19:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Darmo (talk) 19:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Taousert (talk) 19:48, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poslovitch (talk) 19:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Andrewbogott (talk) 00:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support josecurioso ❯❯❯ Tell me! 00:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice clear simple Dschwen (talk) 00:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support AdamSobieski (talk) 01:05, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Peacearth (talk) at 03:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support NaufalF (talk) 04:51, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Esprit Fugace (talk) 05:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support LaMagiaaa (talk) 06:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Siliurp (talk) 07:40, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — putnik 08:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Xiplus (talk) 08:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JakobVoss (talk) 09:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ash Crow (talk) 09:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this logo because it's clean, simple, and lambda is a really cool letter. GLavagetto (WMF) (talk) 11:51, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lionel Allorge (talk) 13:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nadzik (talk) 15:33, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple and easily recognizable, even at small size Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 19:31, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nhakama (talk) 21:09, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lindsaykwardell (talk) 22:59, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this best: the idea of parentheses around a person. The central lambda no longer bothers me now I understand why lambda was chosen in half the logos. I also approve of letting go of the W here. Jane023 (talk) 08:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Estevoaei (talk) 09:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support the wub "?!" 18:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pymouss Tchatcher - 20:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support TomT0m (talk) 10:51, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wikinade (talk) 10:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nouill (talk) 14:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Venca24 (talk) 20:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Xfigpower (yak yak) 21:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kpjas (talk) 23:08, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lagewi (talk) 16:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this one best Lajmmoore (talk) 16:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trey314159 (talk) 17:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support SCardenas (WMF) (talk) 17:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support EponineBunnyKickQueen (talk) 20:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.