User:Marrovi/Unfair

Català - Español - Galego - Português

Unfair or foul game is defined as the act of game or mocking a person or ordinary user by sysops, administrators or stewards; those who try to control the activities of those who open an account in any of the Wikipedia projects, abusing the ordinary user for not possessing any rank or knowledge of the bureaucracy and the norms used by the people of greater power, who at the same time are authorities lead a strong policy of internal rules in each project in order to maintain control groups, which are used to block and expel users due to clashes and discussions.

Unfair is an investigation that has been carried out in a recent way to evaluate the behavior of bureaucrats and administrators in each project, here we try to expose each of the cases, which range from the simplest to the most complex, those that they are the result of strong arguments, envies, abuses of power, racial or ethnic intolerance, political conflicts, verbal aggressions and deceptions, same that are commented between users and people in charge of power in a Wikipedia project.

One of the most common cases is to stain and dirty the reputation of the ordinary user by applying multiple locks to diminish the credibility of the ordinary user and commit a political and pseudo-academic game to refute or reject any position that the ordinary user has; either correct or incorrect. Knowing that no common user will have strong support, this will be expelled from Wikipedia communities for any violation of the rules of the five pillars and charges will be charged so that it does not return to edit.

It seeks to expose different cases of Unfair so that a backup and respect to ordinary users is made that for naivety, harassment, resentment, irresponsibility or incomprehensibility have been expelled from multiple Wikipedia projects to the degree of seeking your ban general or expulsion of all the projects and programs, just because it bothers the people of higher rank the participation of the ordinary user in each project, in addition it looks for the naive or annoying user to have positions and specialized knowledge of many issues in controversy.

Unfair is the result of moving from an ordinary user to a lawyer user who seeks his own self-defense in the absence of any support to explain and expose their cases in the form of ordinary harassment of sexual, intellectual, racial and abuse in the absence of contacts with administrative power or in the absence of a body of defense to study and investigate each case.

How do you start the game?

This is perhaps the most important question. Everything starts from a bad behavior in a Wikipedia projects by the ordinary user.

The ordinary user has violated the rules of good behavior, either by ignorance, anger, pride and decides to confront bureaucrats and administrators who enjoy a certain reputation in each project and no one will question them if they comment abuses against users ordinary people who have decided to exceed the limits of tolerance between people of lower rank against people of higher rank.

Any type of confrontation and discrepancy is punished with blockages, since the judge or administrator believes and verifies that the pact of the five Wikipedia principles has been violated, therefore, it is only blocked due to the size of its error, but if it returns to incur in violating the internal rules of each project, two or three more blocks will be generated that go of a day, three days, a month or a year according to what the judge determines. Since reputation is important to trust the ordinary user, the blocks represent a lack of reliability in the arguments of the sentenced, therefore, to be stained the reputation of the user with multiple locks generated by various disputes of all kinds, this will no longer defense or understanding for their behaviors and comments; from there, the law of Everything you say will be used against for you and the way that administrators will support that they do not commit recklessness or abuse of authority, will use media manipulation to discredit the rebel user if he tries to defend himself before a large number of active and inactive users with a pseudonym or nickname.

There are many appointments received by an ordinary user with a bad reputation, according to the arguments of administrators and bureaucrats, among these is the troll, virus, hacker or criminal, those who will be tagged so that other users obedient to the orders of the administrators, identify them. It is to understand that after the reputation is stained it is impossible to be seen as a good person, although in the Wikipedia projects there will be no room to change the rules or forgive people, since Unfair will be from now on media force to face, which will be supported by policies and contacts that enjoy the power to justify indefinite or permanent blockades. This will be word of mouth and the whole body of Unfair will agree to ban ordinary users of multiple faults for insubordinate to the internal rules of each project.

The group of power of Unfair will be conformed by users with high power within the projects of Wikipedia, besides these will be contacted on a regular basis to attend the cases, because Wikimedia regularly gathers the bureaucrats, administrators and butlers, it will be almost impossible that an ordinary user wants to defend himself, to clarify his bad behavior or to denounce the acts and games of the powerful ones that he will face from now on. Foul play is the phenomenon that will manifest itself if the ordinary user with strong problems with administrators or with powerful editors, decides to act and try to clarify their faults or their ideological positions; here it will not do any good to be smart or a scholar on certain issues to defend themselves, in Unfair will face the policy of expulsions and blockades that comply with the most powerful Wikipedia to not allow objectives or approaches alien to his acts are involved or influence other non-ordinary users with power in some position of Wikipedia, usually this is done to Closed Door to not let infiltrate the problem and the complexities of home case unresolved, which sounds quite conspiratorial, since it pose attack strategies to which the ordinary user will face without his being aware of it.

How to identify the Unfair?

Wikipedia has always been an excellent tool and platform to strengthen the different languages that exist on our world, it's a good material for school works, as well as a door that opens to a second language different from the maternal one; for some reason, the Wikipedia projects have received numerous awards at a planetary level, which speaks well of this non-profit project that has been accepted by thousands of users around the world.