Wikimedia Foundation/Legal/Community Resilience and Sustainability/Trust and Safety/Case Review Committee/Reports
This page contains monthly reports to the Wikimedia community on the activities of the Trust & Safety Case Review Committee (CRC, or CRC). As specified in the Case Review Committee Handbook, reports to the community take place on a monthly basis. Reports are written by the Case Review Committee Facilitator, currently Keegan (WMF) (talk · contribs).
2024
[edit]This quarterly report covers the CRC's activities in the year 2024.
| Time period | Cases ratified | Cases overturned | Cases remanded to T&S | Ineligible appeals | Total appeals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 – 2023 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 29 |
| January – March 2024 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| April – June 2024 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| July-September 2024 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| October-December 2024 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total | 8 | 1 | 1 | 23 | 34 |
2023
[edit]This quarterly report covers the CRC's activities in the year 2023.
The CRC reviewed four eligible appeals in 2023. In three cases, the CRC ratified Trust & Safety's decision and in one case overturned T&S's decision.
The CRC issued a call for new members at the end of 2023, looking to replace members whose terms were expiring.
| Time period | Cases ratified | Cases overturned | Cases remanded to T&S | Ineligible appeals | Total appeals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 – 2022 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 20 |
| January – March 2023 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| April – June 2023 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| July-September 2023 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| October-December 2023 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 29 |
2022
[edit]This report covers the CRC's activities in the year 2022. For this year, appeals are tracked on a quarterly basis. This is the time period that will be used going forward as well.
The CRC appointed two new members in 2022. Near the end of the year, a call for new members for a two-year term was launched.
The CRC reviewed one eligible appeal in 2022. In that case, it ratified Trust & Safety's decision. The CRC also received 10 ineligible appeals. For more information on appeal eligibility, please refer to the case eligibility criteria.
The CRC was also added to the draft language of the revised Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines as a means to appeal.
| Time period | Cases ratified | Cases overturned | Cases remanded to T&S | Ineligible appeals | Total appeals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 – 2021 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| January – March 2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| April – June 2022 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| July – September 2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| October – December 2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Total | 2 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 20 |
December 2021
[edit]Report posted 22:32, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
This is the fifteenth monthly report for the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee (CRC, or ICRC). It covers the CRC's activities from 1 December 2021 to 31 December 2021. For an overview of the CRC and its responsibilities, please refer to the CRC’s page on Meta.
The CRC received one appeal in December 2021.
The CRC also met in December 2021 to discuss the end of its term. The Universal Code of Conduct enforcement pathway is not yet implemented, and there is no permanent process to supersede this committee yet. For this reason, the Foundation decided to extend the current CRC until the end of the calendar year 2022. Five current committee members agreed to stay on the committee, and the Foundation is asking for applicants to fill the remaining committee seats.
| Month | Cases ratified | Cases overturned | Cases remanded to T&S | Ineligible appeals | Total appeals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
November 2020 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| December 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
1 |
1 |
| January 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| February 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| March 2021 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| April 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| May 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| June 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| July 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| August 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| September 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| October 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| November 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| December 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
November 2021
[edit]Report posted 22:32, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
This is the fourteenth monthly report for the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee (CRC, or ICRC). It covers the CRC's activities from 1 November 2021 to 30 November 2021. For an overview of the CRC and its responsibilities, please refer to the CRC’s page on meta.
The CRC received no appeals in November 2021.
| Month | Cases ratified | Cases overturned | Cases remanded to T&S | Ineligible appeals | Total appeals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
November 2020 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| December 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
1 |
1 |
| January 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| February 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| March 2021 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| April 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| May 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| June 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| July 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| August 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| September 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| October 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| November 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
October 2021
[edit]Report posted 03:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
This is the thirteenth monthly report for the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee (CRC, or ICRC). It covers the CRC's activities from 1 October 2021 to 31 October 2021. For an overview of the CRC and its responsibilities, please refer to the CRC’s page on meta.
The CRC received no appeals in October 2021.
| Month | Cases ratified | Cases overturned | Cases remanded to T&S | Ineligible appeals | Total appeals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
November 2020 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| December 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
1 |
1 |
| January 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| February 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| March 2021 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| April 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| May 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| June 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| July 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| August 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| September 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| October 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
September 2021
[edit]Report posted 03:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
This is the twelfth monthly report for the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee (CRC, or ICRC). It covers the CRC's activities from 1 September 2021 to 30 September 2021. For an overview of the CRC and its responsibilities, please refer to the CRC’s page on meta.
The CRC received one appeals in September 2021. It was ineligible for review.
| Month | Cases ratified | Cases overturned | Cases remanded to T&S | Ineligible appeals | Total appeals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
November 2020 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| December 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
1 |
1 |
| January 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| February 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| March 2021 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| April 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| May 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| June 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| July 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| August 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| September 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
August 2021
[edit]Report posted 21:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC).
This is the eleventh monthly report for the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee (CRC, or ICRC). It covers the CRC's activities from 1 August 2021 to 31 August 2021. For an overview of the CRC and its responsibilities, please refer to the CRC’s page on meta.
The CRC received no appeals in August 2021.
| Month | Cases ratified | Cases overturned | Cases remanded to T&S | Ineligible appeals | Total appeals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
November 2020 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| December 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
1 |
1 |
| January 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| February 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| March 2021 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| April 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| May 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| June 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| July 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| August 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
July 2021
[edit]This is the tenth monthly report for the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee (CRC, or ICRC). It covers the CRC's activities from 1 July 2021 to 31 July 2021. For an overview of the CRC and its responsibilities, please refer to the CRC’s page on meta.
The CRC received two appeals in July 2021. Both appeals were ineligible for review.
| Month | Cases ratified | Cases overturned | Cases remanded to T&S | Ineligible appeals | Total appeals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
November 2020 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| December 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
1 |
1 |
| January 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| February 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| March 2021 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| April 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| May 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| June 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| July 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Total | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
June 2021
[edit]Report posted 20:08, 2 July 2021 (UTC).
This is the ninth monthly report for the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee (CRC, or ICRC). It covers the CRC's activities from 1 June 2021 to 30 June 2021. For an overview of the CRC and its responsibilities, please refer to the CRC’s page on meta.
During this period, the CRC received no appeals. Although the CRC was originally expected to conclude on 1 July 2021, the UCoC is now expected to be in development until December 2021. The members of the CRC have agreed to continue serving on the committee until this new December deadline. The CRC's facilitator will be reaching out to Wikimedians this month to inform them of this extended timeline. This outreach also hopes to raise awareness of this process, given the low volume of appeals so far.
| Month | Cases ratified | Cases overturned | Cases remanded to T&S | Ineligible appeals | Total appeals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
November 2020 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| December 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
1 |
1 |
| January 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| February 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| March 2021 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| April 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| May 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| June 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
May 2021
[edit]Report posted 21:47, 17 June 2021 (UTC).
This is the eighth monthly report for the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee (CRC, or ICRC). It covers the CRC's activities from 1 May 2021 to 31 May 2021. For an overview of the CRC and its responsibilities, please refer to the CRC’s page on meta.
During this period, the CRC received no appeals. The CRC did receive one request for unblock. Since the CRC does not deal with community-issued blocks, this request is not counted towards the appeal total.
| Month | Cases ratified | Cases overturned | Cases remanded to T&S | Ineligible appeals | Total appeals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
November 2020 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| December 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
1 |
1 |
| January 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| February 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| March 2021 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| April 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| May 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
April 2021
[edit]Report posted 20:19, 30 April 2021 (UTC).
This is the seventh monthly report for the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee (CRC, or ICRC). It covers the CRC's activities from 1 April 2021 to 30 April 2021. For an overview of the CRC and its responsibilities, please refer to the CRC’s page on meta.
During this period, the CRC received one appeal, which was deemed ineligible for review. The committee has agreed to continue their work beyond the original June 2021 Universal Code of Conduct enforcement pathways deadline until a permanent process is established (see also: IRC office hours 2021-04-17).
| Month | Cases ratified | Cases overturned | Cases remanded to T&S | Ineligible appeals | Total appeals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
November 2020 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| December 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
1 |
1 |
| January 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| February 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| March 2021 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| April 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
March 2021
[edit]Report posted 20:15, 2 April 2021 (UTC).
This is the sixth monthly report for the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee (CRC, or ICRC). It covers the CRC's activities from 1 March 2021 to 31 March 2021. For an overview of the CRC and its responsibilities, please refer to the CRC’s page on meta.
During this period, the CRC reviewed one appeal and found that the original sanctions imposed by Wikimedia Foundation Trust & Safety (T&S) in the case were not severe enough given the severity of the conduct described (as per point 3 in the CRC Handbook review criteria). Based on its findings, the committee returned the case to T&S for further review. This review produced an updated recommendation, and T&S implemented more severe sanctions in the case.
| Month | Cases ratified | Cases overturned | Cases remanded to T&S | Ineligible appeals | Total appeals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
November 2020 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| December 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
1 |
1 |
| January 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| February 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| March 2021 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
February 2021
[edit]Report posted 22:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
This is the fifth monthly report for the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee (CRC, or ICRC). It covers the CRC's activities from 24 January 2021 to 28 February 2021. For an overview of the CRC and its responsibilities, please refer to the CRC’s page on meta.
- During this period, the CRC received one appeal, which was deemed eligible for review. The review is ongoing.
- The CRC prepared its first quarterly report to the Board of Trustees for submission on 1 March 2021, building off the content presented here in the monthly reports.
- The CRC Handbook and Charter have been updated to reflect changes made during the first quarterly meeting (Handbook change, Charter change).
- Through its case reviews, the CRC has been engaging with Foundation Trust & Safety to provide feedback on its processes.
| Month | Cases ratified | Cases overturned | Cases remanded to T&S | Ineligible new appeals | Total new appeals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| November 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| December 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| January 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| February 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
January 2021
[edit]Report posted 21:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
This is the fourth monthly report for the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee (CRC, or ICRC). It covers the CRC's activities from 24 December 2020 to 23 January 2021. For an overview of the CRC and its responsibilities, please refer to the CRC’s page on meta.
During this period, the CRC did not receive any new appeals.
The CRC held its first quarterly meeting in January 2021. The CRC’s Foundation support staff proposed revisions to its Handbook based on learnings from the committee’s initial months. At this meeting, the CRC reviewed, edited, and then approved these changes. These changes will be added to the Meta-Wiki copy of the document in February 2021.
Though the CRC’s first quarter involved a low volume of appeals, the ones that did come in prompted both the committee and its supporting staff to think hard about difficult trust & safety questions. Moving forward, the CRC will work on improving how relevant parties are informed of the appeals process.
Here are the CRC's appeals numbers to date:
| Month | Cases ratified | Cases overturned | Cases remanded to T&S | Ineligible new appeals | Total new appeals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| November 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| December 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| January 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
December 2020
[edit]Report posted 23:08, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
This is the third monthly report for the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee (CRC, or ICRC). It covers the CRC's activities from 23 November, 2020 to 23 December, 2020. For an overview of the CRC and its responsibilities, please refer to the CRC’s page on meta.
During this monthly period:
- The CRC completed its first case review. The CRC determined that the original Trust & Safety (T&S) office action being appealed in this case was appropriate.
- The CRC received one new appeal, which was deemed ineligible for review by the Foundation's legal counsel.
Please see the CRC Charter for details on case eligibility and the CRC Handbook for more on the CRC appeals and review process.
Here are the CRC's appeals numbers to date:
| Month | Cases ratified | Cases overturned | Cases remanded to T&S | Ineligible new appeals | Total new appeals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| November 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| December 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
November 2020
[edit]Report posted 19:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
This is the second monthly report for the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee (CRC, or ICRC). It covers the CRC's activities from 21 October 2020 to 24 November 2020. For an overview of the CRC and its responsibilities, please refer to the CRC’s page on meta.
The CRC received its first request for appeal during this period and three appeals in total. One of these appeals was deemed eligible for review by the Foundation's legal counsel. The review is ongoing.
October 2020
[edit]Report posted 21:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
This is the first monthly report for the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee (CRC, or ICRC). For an overview of the CRC and its responsibilities, please refer to the CRC’s page on meta.
Activities
[edit]The CRC convened for the first time virtually in mid-September. In this meeting, they discussed the appeals process in detail and asked questions of the Foundation staff who are supporting their work. Notably, the CRC created the Vice Chair position. The Vice Chair will be able to help with Chair duties in cases where the Chair is unavailable, but will not have access to the appeals inbox or receive other information designated only for the Chair, such as why an appeal was not eligible. No modification to the Handbook was necessary for this change. The CRC elected leadership (Chair and Vice Chair) after the meeting. Once leadership was selected, the CRC began to accept appeals.
On 28 September, a notice that appeals were open was posted on the English Wikipedia village pump, the wikimedia-l mailing list, the Wikipedia Weekly Facebook group, and the CRC talk page on meta.
As of this report, there have been no appeals.
Updated FAQ
[edit]This section updates the FAQ on the CRC Charter, including three new questions.
New questions
[edit]- Q. How long does the process take?
- A. The amount of time it takes Foundation counsel to review an appeal’s eligibility depends on the volume of appeals. As long as there is no significant backlog, it should not take more than a few days for an appeal to be reviewed by counsel.
- Q. Do I need to submit appeals in English?
- A. Appeals may be submitted in any language. Appeals submitted in a language where T&S does not have internal capacity may take a bit longer to process.
- Q. Can conduct warnings be appealed?
- A. Yes. Trust & Safety’s sanctions toolkit ranges from “no sanctions” to “conduct warning” to “event ban” (temporary or permanent) to “global ban.” The committee might decide that a user who was warned should have been banned or that a user who was banned should have been warned. It might decide that a user who received no sanctions should have been sanctioned by the Foundation. Please see the table in the CRC handbook for more details.
Updated questions
[edit]- Q. Why are the committee members anonymous?
- A. Community governance carries with it several risks, including a risk of retaliation by people disappointed with case review outcomes (even from those who are simply informed that their case is not eligible for review, for instance, because it is criminal in nature) and a risk of pressure to expose private information, even through hostile external organizations or governments. For the safety of the interim committee members and for the safety of individuals involved in cases, the Foundation requires this anonymity to reduce these risks. However, the members of the committee have been identified to the Ombuds Commission, a small trusted group of community functionaries, who can confirm general details about the composition of the committee.
- Q. Who will be reviewing these applications?
- A. Some stewards who do not themselves intend to apply have agreed to review applications to help assess suitability to serve in this capacity. The final selection from amongst candidates they deem eligible will be made by the General Counsel.
- Q. What steps are being taken to protect the privacy of individuals who lodge complaints with Trust & Safety or are accused of wrongdoing?
- A. In order to even review the case files, the Case Review Committee will need to enter into a legal relationship with the Wikimedia Foundation that allows us to safely share this material. The legal documents they sign will also include a very specific non-disclosure agreement. Please see this page for a copy of the legal agreement.
- Q. What kind of cases can this committee review?
- A. This committee is able to review cases that are accepted by Trust & Safety for assessment under its policies that are not conducted because of statutory, regulatory, employment, or legal policies. A Foundation attorney will determine what cases are eligible for appeal. The intention of the review is to provide assurance of appropriateness and fairness for what has been termed “borderline” cases of harassment and incivility, including cases that should perhaps have been left to community governance processes. Cases where the Foundation’s attorneys assess a legal duty to act are excluded. Members of the committee do not have access to those files.
- Q. Will the case review committee be able to review older cases?
- A. The case review committee may review any eligible case handled by Trust & Safety regardless of whether the case was closed before or after the date the committee was established. Each case may be reviewed only once. Launching the review of a case requires that an appeal be made by an individual directly involved in a case, either in requesting the case or being the subject of the case.
- Q. How does this committee work? What are its precise processes?
- A. Please see the committee’s handbook for a detailed account of its processes. There is a a special account for this committee to receive appeal requests that is accessible by the committee chair and by a contractor supplied to support the committee with its communications and paperwork.
- Q. Who in the Wikimedia Foundation will know the identity of committee members?
- A. The Executive Director, the General Counsel, the Deputy General Counsel, the Senior Counsel supporting the committee, the Vice President of Community Resilience & Sustainability, and the contractor hired to support the committee's work have access to the finalized list of participants. One additional legal staff member required to support in finalizing and filing signed agreements also has access to this information. Each of these individuals is under a Non-Disclosure Agreement with the Foundation and aware of their responsibilities to hold this information confidential. Beyond this, there is no current intention to share this information with other staff and contractors of the Foundation; rather, steps have been taken to isolate this information, including from individuals who work on the Foundation's Trust & Safety team. There may be reasons that will arise that will require additional staff being made aware of the identities of these individuals, and thus the agreement requires that the committee members authorize sharing this information with the Foundation in general. Foundation attorneys need to remain flexible to support and protect the committee and the community and will determine if additional internal Foundation disclosure is required. The members of the committee will be advised if their identities need to be shared with any others on staff or contracted by the Foundation and why.