Grants talk:IdeaLab/33% reservation to women Wikipedia admins
Add topicAppearance
(Redirected from Grants talk:IdeaLab/33% reservation to women wikipedia admins)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Ekips39 in topic Find qualified candidates
Find qualified candidates
[edit]SELECT user_name, user_editcount, YEAR(user_registration) AS "Year started",
CONCAT("http://enwp.org/Special:Search/adminship_prefix:User_talk:",REPLACE(user_name, " ", "_"),"/") AS "Suggested"
FROM user
JOIN user_properties ON up_user=user_id AND up_property="gender" AND up_value="female"
LEFT JOIN user_groups ON ug_user=user_id AND ug_group IN ("sysop", "bot")
LEFT JOIN page ON page_namespace=4
AND page_title=CONCAT("Requests_for_adminship/", REPLACE(user_name, " ", "_"))
WHERE user_editcount > 1000
AND page_id IS NULL
AND ug_group IS NULL
ORDER BY user_editcount DESC
LIMIT 50;
The above query (run on Quarry) generates a list of Wikipedians who've selected the "She edits wiki pages" option. You can then nominate her to the 7 day trial where every edit is questioned and every person slighted can speak out against her. Good Luck. Dispenser (talk) 22:11, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Post the results so you can get to work. Dispenser (talk) 00:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think Flyer22's block log should disqualify her. Most of them were due to someone else -- her brother, apparently -- causing her to look as if she were using socks, and the one for edit warring was removed as "unnecessary" (and was made by DangerousPanda, which some would argue casts further doubt on its validity). She also seems to have accepted at least one adminship offer, if you click on "suggested", but the RFA page was never created. Ekips39 (talk) 13:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- You're right. Go ahead and ask her! I've changed the layout to make it more inductive to editing so we can keep track. Dispenser (talk) 17:20, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- I've taken you up on your suggestion. [1] Ekips39 (talk) 02:42, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- You're right. Go ahead and ask her! I've changed the layout to make it more inductive to editing so we can keep track. Dispenser (talk) 17:20, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think Flyer22's block log should disqualify her. Most of them were due to someone else -- her brother, apparently -- causing her to look as if she were using socks, and the one for edit warring was removed as "unnecessary" (and was made by DangerousPanda, which some would argue casts further doubt on its validity). She also seems to have accepted at least one adminship offer, if you click on "suggested", but the RFA page was never created. Ekips39 (talk) 13:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)